March 2021 edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Hut 8.5 20:16, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Hut 8.5. I created a talk page for both Timeline of COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria (January–June 2020) and Timeline of COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria (July-December 2020), and I inserted copy templates into the talk pages of these two articles and the original COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria article, but that is still not a substitution for attributing the history of the pages in the edit summary when I created them, and I can't rectify that, and I'm sorry. I created two separate articles devoted to the timeline because none of the references on COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria article were displayed. I was inspired by COVID-19 pandemic in the Republic of Ireland, because there are three different articles that describe the timeline in detail, while the timeline section of COVID-19 pandemic in the Republic of Ireland consists of a summary. If the two articles that I created should not exist due to violation of copyright or attribution issues, please don't hesitate to delete the articles. Thank you. Fuadach (talk) 23:38, 3 March 2021 (UTC).Reply
There's nothing wrong with splitting an article out like that, it's very common to do that when an article gets too long, and they aren't going to be deleted. You can still add the appropriate attribution just by making an edit (any edit, it doesn't have to be anything useful) and put an edit summary of something like "content copied from X, see that page's edit history for attribution". That's enough to satisfy the legal requirements. Hut 8.5 21:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Oh I actually already did that today at 16:00 to Timeline of COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria (July–December 2020) by just removing a space. If you take a look at the revision history of that page, you will notice that I just copied the edit summary that you used to provide the proper attribution to the editors of the copied material from COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria. Fuadach (talk) 21:52, 4 March 2021 (UTC).Reply
OK, that's fine then. Hut 8.5 08:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: COVID-19 vaccination in Nigeria has been accepted edit

 
COVID-19 vaccination in Nigeria, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 07:55, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for COVID-19 Barnstar edit

  COVID-19 Barnstar
Thank you for your exponential contributions to all African COVID-19 related articles. Stay Safe and continue editing TapticInfo (talk) 20:24, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for your tireless and outstanding contributions to COVID-19 related articles! Edl-irishboy (talk) 18:05, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Edl-irishboy (talk) 18:05, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Timelines of the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Timelines of the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 03:44, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply