Frog890

Thanks

Thank you for the barnstar! I think you did a good job with the article. Edenc1 • Talk 04:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:07, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Ok Thanks. I didn't know.

Re:Why you erased my photo

I answered on my talkpage - see Bulwersator 04:51, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

My reply: Hi it is already gone. I am not going to waste anymore time. You did wrong believe me. But I don't care anymore it's done you just wasted my time and my work by deleting something that wasn't meant to be deleted. But do whatever you want. Good luck.--RG9 07:33, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Just a Note

And just a note in general. What you are quoting is not referring to the Getty images file we are talking about here. That was a completely different file that actually was deleted without a good reason and as I think by mistake, and that quote was not directed to anyone in particular. There is no lying, do a better research before replying please, check and you'll see you are mistaken. The apologies were done regarding everything including that. If you or any other chose not to believe me that's your problem. And maybe you don't notice it but many accounts are used by different people, many agencies around the world use Wikipedia. If it is not permitted you must make that crystal clear when a new user sigs up as many other things to avoid later misunderstandings. I just find really sad and disappointing, the lack of nobility from some administrators from the community shown to their users that refuse to show kindness and understanding after several sincere and humble apologies that are presented to you with the best intention and talk to us with such lack of skill and lack of politeness. The way you like to humiliate your users is a true shame you impose to yourselves and to Wikipedia and its other projects that I think try to stand as something better than this. There are ways to talk to each other. And if this is a community you should start acting like that. The way you use your virtual power and the way you treat the users is really wrong. You have to reconsider many things and certainly you have to reconsider your attitude. This account has done many, many more good things than bad. And the wrong doings were simply human mistakes and misunderstandings. And don't presume that all the administrators are pristine because I had administrators with actual rude words written on their edits of my files thing that I've never done you can also check if you want. It is just an immense disappointment that could have been prevented by some mature display from some administrators towards me and I am sure many others. Thinking that you are right or that you have the right doesn't allow you to be disrespectful and to humiliate your users. Your first obligation must be having communication skills, maturity and respect to your users no matter what. And that is certainly something many administrators don't have. You are very rude and very fast on labeling and judging without making an actual case first. At least I apologized for my mistakes. You just go around acting like you know best but don't know how to actually deliver it properly. You are creating a very hostile environment and a community that is not treated with respect and that has so many complaints won't thrive but the entire contrary. You have to set a better example and if you are taking the trouble to participate trouble yourselves harder when it comes to your attitude and learn how to treat and talk to people. And I am not asking for replies if any have something to say, say it at your own talk pages. Thanks a lot.--O10 03:19, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User talk:Frog890

Hello Frog890. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User talk:Frog890, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Does not apply to user talk pages. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Tired and Disappointed

This user is just tired of it all.