May 2016

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from CAHDİ Party. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 09:35, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to CAHDİ Party, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted.

The article is also a bit promotionally written. Please find independent reliable sources and rewrite the article in a more neutral tone, instead of removing the maintenance tags (which are there to help editors see that the article needs improvement). If you have questions, the tea house board is a good place to ask them. Thanks. bonadea contributions talk 10:20, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to CAHDİ Party, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 12:09, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at CAHDİ Party. bonadea contributions talk 12:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 12:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

May 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of political parties in Somalia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Fotovenus. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 15:46, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

May 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at CAHDİ Party, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.

Do not add titles, such as "Professor" or "Prof", to people's names. It is against the manual of style, as mentioned several times already. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 12:29, 27 May 2016 (UTC)Reply