January 2008

edit

  Your recent edit to Astrosaurs (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 18:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Hddd

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Hddd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mønobi 18:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Worms (series). Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Worms (series) was changed by Flaminor (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-01-11T18:09:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Hddd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. I JUST DID THOUGH! (Flaminor (talk) 18:11, 11 January 2008 (UTC)) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. J Milburn (talk) 18:10, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Waggy man

A tag has been placed on Waggy man, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bagheera (talk) 18:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Bonjo

edit

A tag has been placed on Bonjo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 18:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why do you wanna delete that? i want to tell everybody about Bonjo! you are nasty and cruel! (Flaminor (talk) 18:20, 11 January 2008 (UTC))Reply

Bonjo

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bonjo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Bonjo. Acroterion (talk) 18:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk) 18:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


But the article belongs to me! duh! YOU HAVE NO PERMISSION TO REMOVE IT! (Flaminor (talk) 18:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC))Reply

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 18:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Bit rich. (Flaminor (talk) 18:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC))Reply

Re: Can't i

edit

Re your message: Your best friend is not currently notable per the guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia. Perhaps in the future, but not currently. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 18:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply