July 2012

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Stephanie Adams shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:27, 2 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm not trying to start a war, I'm just trying to add relevant information about the topic. Only one sentence was elaborated upon. Otherwise, the comment added prior to my editing appears to be trivia. Can you help? Fiiinally (talk) 17:31, 2 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • Such commentary on her own lesson is simply not of encyclopedic value, as seems to be agreed upon because you've been reverted by different editors. Sorry, but that's something for a news item, not for an encyclopedic article. Drmies (talk) 18:33, 2 July 2012 (UTC)Reply