Fair use rationale for File:2009_AMGA_Income_Chart.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:2009_AMGA_Income_Chart.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 01:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Name change

edit

Hello Fiftytoone,

See Wikipedia:Article titles. Neutralitytalk 19:10, 19 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.oana.org/about-us or elsewhere online. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:14, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

I don’t believe this is a copyright violation. The information I used comes directly from MY national association’s advocacy page. These documents were designed by the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists. The association allows its members, which I am one, to use these advocacy documents however we choose without concern of copyright violations. Bottom line, using the content of these publications is exactly what they were designed for. They are even referenced. Will you kindly restore the additions made to these pages? Fiftytoone (talk) 11:42, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nurse Anesthetists page

edit

Also, why did you remove the “also known as nurse anesthesiologist?” These changes were made by board certified CRNAs and members of the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists. Who better to authenticate legitimacy of the information?

Fiftytoone (talk) 12:10, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Furthermore....

edit

The information on the OANA webpage, which is a state association affiliated with the national association, is the identical document produced by the AANA; a document that the AANA not only authorizes but encourages it’s members to use. We have full rights and discretion to use this information. Fiftytoone (talk) 12:15, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Fiftytoone. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Nurse anesthetist, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:31, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply