FiatMoneyWillDieInTheEnd
 | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Karmaisking (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Welcome!
Hello, FiatMoneyWillDieInTheEnd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Austrian business cycle theory does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! – S. Rich (talk) 02:21, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
edit
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 02:22, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Actually, Fiat, your first two contributions demonstrate a familiarity with Wikipedia editing. In any event, I hope you will consider your point of view and seek to edit from a non-POV frame of mind. Please take a look at the Ideological Turing Test and see if you can pass. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 02:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Srich32977: I wouldn't bother, this is another obvious KiK sock. Ravensfire (talk) 15:00, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Karmaisking (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Mike V • Talk 15:25, 3 October 2015 (UTC) |