Famesoft
Welcome!
Hello, Famesoft, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like FaMe Soft, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Graymornings(talk) 06:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on FaMe Soft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Graymornings(talk) 06:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Super Plusha, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://gp32.narod.ru/plusha.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:57, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
"Harmless" is not the issue
editHi. Your article was tagged for lack of notability and I agreed with the assesment as it lacked reliable third-party sources and mad no overall effort to establish notability. Just because a company exists or existed doesn't necessarily make it a candidate for inclusion. Please see WP:COMPANY to learn more. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 07:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry you feel that way, but we have no way of knowing whether or not you actually own the material. You would have to follow the instructions in the template below to find out how you can release it under this site's license. Good luck! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 08:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 and later."
You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page.
- At least I don't think you can sue yourself. :) Seriously, you'd have to release the rights on the external link itself which in turn would leave it open for distribution, duplication and modification under the terms of the GFDL license. My suggestion: In order to protect your copyright (which you're basically giving up in a way by agreeing to the GFDL), simply rewrite the material in your own words using the websites as references and make sure that you add verifiable third-part sources. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 08:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you. :) I'm pleased to be able to help and I hope you enjoy editing here. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)