Hello, Factcheck5512, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Factcheck5512, good luck, and have fun. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:07, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Chris Troutman (talk) 13:07, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

PRISM (surveillance program)

edit

Hello.

I noticed your edits to the PRISM (surveillance program) article.

Please see the WP:NPOV policy.

Also, the encyclopedic voice shouldn't use the first person. ("We cannot target even foreign persons overseas without a valid foreign intelligence purpose.")

If you'd like to suggest further changes to the article, please post to the talk page.

Feel free to ask me if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Benjamin (talk) 12:30, 5 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the concern, however, I must advice - indeed, I must insist: Please see the reference included in the edit I provided. I put it there for a reason. "We cannot target even foreign persons overseas without a valid intelligence purpose." Is a quote from within the reference. 3rd paragrah, last sentence.

Since all of my edits have been worded in neutrual language, and have all been sourced correctly - no issue is actually valid.

Regrads, a fact-checker

Room 641A

edit

Please stop vandalizing NSA-related articles, like Room 641A and pushing non-neutral points of view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:4040:500B:800:6486:5196:A51B:DB25 (talk) 21:17, 5 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

All edits have been in in neutral language, and sourced to the according Court ruling. If you believe the language is out of order, please take that to the Judge that issued the ruling. Any further vandilisation of the entry will result in consequences.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Factcheck5512 (talkcontribs) 01:03, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Might I ask what you mean by "consequences"? Magic9mushroom (talk) 13:23, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
I, too, would like to see some clarification about "consequences" in light of WP:THREAT. Perhaps we ought to remember that Wikipedia is just a website and nothing anyone does here matters all that much. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:32, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism to articles about NSA surveillance

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

September 2019

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User talk:Factcheck5512, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button   located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:33, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply