September 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm MRD2014. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Tashkent Polytechnical Museum— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MRD2014 (talk) (contribs) 22:56, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to CHEZ-FM. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —MRD2014 (talk) (contribs) 22:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to CHEZ-FM, you may be blocked from editing. —MRD2014 (talk) (contribs) 23:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chez. -- Gestrid (talk) 23:38, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Evan2963/sandbox

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Evan2963/sandbox, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Gestrid (talk) 23:42, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:21, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

September 2016

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Evan2963/sandbox. Do not change other peoples' talk page comments to reflect your own agenda! -- Gestrid (talk) 01:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply