Welcome

edit

Welcome, and thank you for your edits. I have undone your edits to woodcreeper as most available evidence now shows they are deeply embedded within the ovenbirds, and are best treated as a subfamily, not a separate family. Cheers. Sabine's Sunbird talk 04:31, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Old world quail

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Old world quail, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Quail. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:04, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Owlet-Nightjar

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Owlet-Nightjar, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Owlet-nightjar. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Grui

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Grui, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Gruiformes. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:13, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Galbulae

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Galbulae, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Piciformes. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:16, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Creating copies of pages

edit

Hey, I'm Airplaneman. Welcome to Wikipedia! When creating pages that are alternately named, don't copy content. Instead, create a Redirect to the page in question. If you have any more questions, feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy editing, Airplaneman 21:20, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Did you get my message? Please stop, and ask if you don't get it. I've had to redirect numerous pages, including this. Airplaneman 21:30, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Please, please stop. I've had to redirect numerous of your new pages. I'm going to have to report you for disruptive editing if you continue, as nobody likes cleaning up after someone why has been given fair warning to stop. Thanks, Airplaneman 21:37, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

American barbet

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of American barbet, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Capitonidae. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:23, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Old world sparrow

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Old world sparrow, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Sparrow. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:31, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Notice

edit

  Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Old world sparrow, to Wikipedia as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:34, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Asian frogmouth

edit
 

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Asian frogmouth. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Frogmouth. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Frogmouth - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Airplaneman 04:00, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Copying and pasting pages

edit

Please stop creating duplicate articles. Doing so breaks the page history and is thus a copyright violation under the terms of Wikipedia's licence. If you come across a title that is covered by an article at a different title, please insert the code #REDIRECT [[Name Of Page]]. If you persist in creating duplicate articles, you may be blocked from editing here as doing so is disruptive. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:12, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Editing

edit

Hi, it appears that you are trying really hard to contribute to Wikipedia, and it's nice to see such enthusiasm. However, you've been creating a lot of duplicate articles and causing some extra work to be done by other editors. Perhaps you should seek out a mentor at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. If you continue on like you have, you'll probably end up being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Let me know if you need more help. Dreadstar 04:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Phasianoidea

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Phasianoidea, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Galliformes. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:35, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pici (suborder)

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Pici (suborder), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Piciformes. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:38, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Cettiid warbler

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cettiid warbler, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.kiwifoto.com/galleries/birds/odedi. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:40, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pygmy wren-babbler

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Pygmy wren-babbler, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Pnoepyga. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:41, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, American warbler

edit
 

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, American warbler. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - New World warbler. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at New World warbler - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Terrillja talk 02:46, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Cettiid warbler

edit
 

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Cettiid warbler. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Cettiidae. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Cettiidae - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Terrillja talk 02:48, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Pici (suborder)

edit
 

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Pici (suborder). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Piciformes. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Piciformes - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Terrillja talk 02:49, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply


Blocked

edit

Since you've decided to continue creating duplicate articles and have not responded to the concerns of other editors here on your talk page, I've [{WP:BLOCK|blocked]] your account. 03:05, 13 June 2010 (UTC)