User talk:Erxnmedia/Archive 6

The Cardboards

Just a friendly note that I've nominated The Cardboards for deletion (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cardboards (2nd nomination)). If you have any sources showing notability that you haven't added yet, it would be great if you did so. Thanks!--Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:51, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Cardboards (2nd nomination)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 16:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

United States presidential election debates, 2008

Please explain to me how a lien is relevant to the debate. The article is supposed to be about the debate. --Onorem♠Dil 20:21, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

It is relevant because, in combination with his comment about "taxation without representation" and reference to Boston Tea Party clearly puts him in the far right wing survivalist tax protestor camp, which is something you are working hard to obscure with your edits. Erxnmedia (talk) 20:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

It still isn't clear to me what that has to do with the debate. In his bio, sure...as long as it's reliably sourced. I just don't see how it relates to the debate. --Onorem♠Dil 20:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

It has to do with the debate in the sense that McCain positioned him rhetorically as a blue collar everyman, whereas in reality his politics are far to the right of the median distribution for blue collar -- much farther right than McCain himself, unless McCain wants to be identified as a tax protestor/survivalist/Aryan Nation type. Therefore it is of interest, in asking whether McCain is trying to get far right fringe/Aryan Nation votes without actually representing himself as such. Erxnmedia (talk) 20:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm not going to remove it again, although I think your reasoning is laughable. Being pissed about taxes and mentioning taxation without representation does not automatically make someone a survivalist aryan nation member. Your POV is clear though, and I just don't care that much anymore. --Onorem♠Dil 20:54, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

It's the combination of pissed about taxes plus not paying them that makes the difference. It's not rocket science. How many people in this country have tax judgements against them? I've never met one. Also it appears that McCain may have paid him to ask Obama questions, so there is a strong possibility that he is a plant. Erxnmedia (talk) 20:56, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

According to your source, the state files hundreds of liens a day. The rest is interesting speculation. Feel free to add it once it's covered by a reliable source. --Onorem♠Dil 21:00, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

You have incoirrectly added information about taxes - only one lien is to do with taxes - read the sources. It is for a relatively trivial amount moreover. However, more than anything else I think you need to familiaries yourself with WP:BLP as under that policy I believe that info should not be included. It is inappropriate to publicise further information about an individual's debts. --Matilda ^talk 04:13, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on United States presidential election debates, 2008. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Onorem♠Dil 22:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

JtP

Thought you might like to comment on the subject of the amount of detail in the Debate article. [1]. Dp76764 (talk) 22:43, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Updated, thanks. Erxnmedia (talk) 22:55, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up on the arbitration, albeit it is too early and will fail. Inclusionist (talk) 05:13, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

I predict that all of the feverish deletions of JP negatives will end on November 4th.Erxnmedia (talk) 05:15, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

It doesn't take Nostradamus to predict this. :) Inclusionist (talk) 05:19, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

No, you're incorrect. IF there's an article on November 4th, JTP will still be treated like any other article, especially with regard to WP:BLP (and I'm voting for "That One", so it's definitely not partisan) SirFozzie (talk) 07:18, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

As the policy for Arbitration requests stand, you are required to not just notify the other parties but also provide the links to prove that you have made such notifications. Could you please do that? - Penwhale | ^{Blast him / Follow his steps} 08:38, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

• When notifying people - you should have signed your contribution (ie with ~~~~ ) --Matilda ^talk 20:13, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Request for mediation

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Joe the Plumber, and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Wikipedia, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, Inclusionist (talk) 04:27, 26 October 2008 (UTC) Inclusionist (talk) 04:27, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

BLP privacy policy for limited public figures

I think that the current deadlock on Joe the plumber is due to unclear BLP policy on limited public figures. I've made a proposal to clarify the policy here. Since you are one of the parties involved in the dispute, this is a notification for your input on the proposed policy clarification. VG ☎ 10:56, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Request for mediation not accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Joe the Plumber. For the Mediation Committee, WJBscribe (talk) 14:25, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Israeli support for Iran during the Iran–Iraq war

My bad. My rvt of your Ronen Bergman edits was a stupid mistake. --BoogaLouie (talk) 23:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Request for involvement

According to the history of the Iran-Iraq War article, you are a significant contributor to it. Therefore, I was wondering if you would like to get involved in a discussion I have started concerning a proposal to trim some sections, and move some text back into the article. The discussion can be found here: [2]. Thank you very much if you do get involved. Cheers for reading. Terrakyte (talk) 22:37, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

TomCat4680 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

TomCat4680 (talk) 14:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

I got one and decided to send one to everyone that's ever written on my talk page

TomCat4680 (talk) has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

!TomCat4680 (talk) 14:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Gay Face

An article that you have been involved in editing, Gay Face, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gay Face. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 18:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Please leave your personal opininos about other editors out of article talkspace

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Air Force One photo op controversy. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Article talk pages are not your personal soapboxes to rail against other editors, in this case, myself. Tarc (talk) 16:46, 30 April 2009 (UTC)