English Drama

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Enneagram of Personality, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Enneagram of Personality was changed by English Drama (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.887844 on 2012-04-06T18:30:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:30, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Re: ClueBot's deletion of my work! I think what ClueBot didn't like was that I saved my changes before I added the references, but this is frustrating to me - I am trying to learn how to reference a chapter within an edited book, and I saved some changes before I figured out how to add the reference - but I was still working on it! ok, I will accept this part as "my bad" and learn to be more orderly in how I make changes. But: ClueBot also deleted a perfectly good reference I added in a "reference needed" section. Also, I changed wording from: "The origin and history of the Enneagram are matters of dispute" to "The origin and history of the Enneagram are matters of ongoing discussion and research." and ClueBot deleted that. I think my wording is more collegial and actually more accurate. I think referring to a "dispute" is unnecessarily confrontational, and part of the reason this page is protected in the first place. Thanks for listening.

ClueBot is an automated programme to combat vandalism which probably just found a keyword it didn't like and reverted. See this page to report the false positive. Rcsprinter (natter) 18:59, 6 April 2012 (UTC)