In regard to the claims of association of persons committing crimes in the Czech Republic and the Grail Movement, I am now in possession of and can supply a certified translation of the Prague Court findings of 27th October 2009, that confirm that press articles stating this association existed and/or played a role in this crime were falsifications.As such, any references to this association to that crime would be false and should not be permitted to be added to the Grail Movement or any other Wikipedia pages that refer to the Grail Movement or associated publication, entities or activities. Emmisgood (talk) 04:21, 18 October 2014 (UTC) emmisgoodReply

Noticeboard notification

edit

There is a discussion about your edits at WP:RSN. Tgeorgescu (talk) 17:35, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

edit

Hello, Emmisgood. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 16:06, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A summary of site policies and guidelines you may find useful

edit
  • Please sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~, found next to the 1 key), and please do not alter other's comments.
  • "Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
  • We do not publish original thought nor original research. We merely summarize reliable sources without elaboration or interpretation.
  • Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
  • Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. This usually means that secular academia is given prominence over any individual sect's doctrines, though those doctrines may be discussed in an appropriate section that clearly labels those beliefs for what they are.

Reformulated:

Also, not a policy or guideline, but something important to understand the above policies and guidelines: Wikipedia operates off of objective information, which is information that multiple persons can examine and agree upon. It does not include subjective information, which only an individual can know from an "inner" or personal experience. Most religious beliefs fall under subjective information. Wikipedia may document objective statements about notable subjective claims (i.e. "Christians believe Jesus is divine"), but it does not pretend that subjective statements are objective, and will expose false statements masquerading as subjective beliefs (cf. Indigo children). Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply