EdwardMorris

February 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Irvine, California has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Irvine, California was changed by EdwardMorris (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886156 on 2017-02-04T22:38:37+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:38, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Irvine, California. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:40, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Irvine, California, you may be blocked from editing. Pmokeefe (talk) 22:43, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Exemplo347 (talk) 22:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Favonian (talk) 22:54, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EdwardMorris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Persuant to the WP policies of unblock and assume good faith, it is required of the WP administration to unblock me immediately. Good faith has not been assumed because there is no evidence that this is a so called "vandalism only account" because you have no way of knowing what the contributions immediately after this one may look like. In order for this block to be justified, you would have to unblock this account and then make note of the contributions that go on thereafter. Action taken even a moment before is unjustified action, both by WP policy standards, and international law, specifically the Geneva Convention. Please unblock before incurring pertinent consequences. Thank you. EdwardMorris (talk) 23:00, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Wasting admin time with spurious requests. Talk page access revoked. Huon (talk) 00:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It is possible that this account is a sock of Darkhawk. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Bad_faith_user. DarkKnight2149 23:08, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

-- what the hell? - Darkhawk