Earlyriser10

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or sock puppetry.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 13:38, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Actually I wanted to redirect it Earlyriser10 (talk) 10:41, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Pakistani memogate, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 04:04, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of NATO supply Line for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NATO supply Line is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NATO supply Line until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shadowjams (talk) 06:04, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:01, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Ignore my previous message. That was my mistake. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 20:35, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

What did you think about the deletion notice you received?

Hi Earlyriser10,

In November you received a message about either "Nomination for deletion" or "Proposed deletion" of an article you created. I'd like to ask you a few quick questions:

1. Was the message helpful? Were the instructions clear and easy to follow?
2. If not, how do you think the message could be improved?
3. What do you think about the deletion process in general? Do you understand how to contest a deletion?

You can feel free to answer on my talk page or send me your response by email (mpinchukwikimedia.org). (I won't quote you or link your answers to your username if you don't feel comfortable with that.) Your feedback is incredibly useful for improving the content of deletion notifications, so please take a minute to think about and answer these questions. Thank you! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 19:59, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Earlyriser10. You have new messages at Talk:Ahmadiyya.
Message added 09:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I've moved your section to the bottom where it belongs and asked some questions. Dougweller (talk) 10:52, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:14, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Ahmadiyya

I don't see any cult followers removing tags. I see another administrator who I can guarantee is not a "cult follower" and an editor who doesn't seem to be editing on any related articles. I'll reply to your article talk page post there. Dougweller (talk) 13:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

June 2012

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. You also removed sources which are what we consider to be reliable sources and added sources which fail our criteria, and scribd.com is a copyvio site. Removing "known as Ahmadi Muslims" is unacceptable as it is clearly the case that they are known as Ahmadi Muslims, and that others disagree with them being called that is irrelevant. Dougweller (talk) 10:34, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Ahmeddiya page

4 editors have now reverted you, three of them, including me, Administrators. Rather than throw around accusations of ownership you need to figure out why this is happening to your edits. Dougweller (talk) 13:08, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

Your recent editing history at Ahmadiyya shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 13:09, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

EARLY RISER : ARE YOU A TERRORIST ON SOME MISSION???? YOU SHOULD BE REPORTED TO HOMELAND SECURITY FOR INVESTIGATIONS INTO YOUR CONDUCT. YOU ARE MAKING EDITS WITH DELIBERATE INTENT TO PROPAGATE DEATH THREATS AGAINST DR ASARULISLAM SYED. SHAME ON YOU. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibne'Ishaq (talk • contribs) 18:08, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Great,being called a terrorist on wikipedia for factual correction,thats a first Earlyriser10 (talk)