Notability of Cameron Feagin

edit

A tag has been placed on Cameron Feagin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Notability of The Real World: Atlanta

edit

A tag has been placed on The Real World: Atlanta, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix 06:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

If you are an employee of MTV or of Real World's producers, then you are violating Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines by editing about Real World. But somehow, I doubt that you would be casting for a show that is not even going to appear until seven years from now. Please see Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. We do not post rumors. Provide concrete evidence, and then it might, just might be acceptable. Otherwise, you are engaging in edit warring, which is frowned upon on Wikipedia. Take the discussion to the article's discussion page. Corvus cornix 06:58, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Little context in The Real World: Back to Los Angeles

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The Real World: Back to Los Angeles, by Axlq, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The Real World: Back to Los Angeles is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The Real World: Back to Los Angeles, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate The Real World: Back to Los Angeles itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


June 2007

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. An article you recently created, The Real World: Back to Los Angeles, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Ocatecir Talk 06:36, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


A tag has been placed on Brooke LaBarbera, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MKoltnow 03:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself, as you did with Brooke LaBarbera. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. ~EnviroboyTalkContribs - 03:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


  Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Davis Mallory. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~EnviroboyTalkContribs - 03:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Davis Mallory, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. MKoltnow 03:52, 9 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Minimal articles

edit

Hello. It's imaginable that you have something to say that's worth saying on Brooke LaBarbara and the rest. If so, first write such an article (for example on the hard drive of your own computer), and then, when your draft makes the notability of the person clear, post the draft as an article. And not before. -- Hoary 03:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Allie DiMeco, you will be blocked from editing. Jet123 (Talk) 04:23, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply