EMBaero
Thanks for the attention to UTA colors edit
Thanks for the attention to UTA colors, BUT... You are confusing the colors approved for the communications identity of the school with the school's branding effort and official colors. Orange is not an official color of UTA. (It is the official color of the UT System, and that is a whole different discussion.) If you can find a source that says UTA has now adopted orange as an official school color, then edit the encyclopedia to reflect that change. Until then please refrain from editing the official colors. Tee Owe (talk) 22:25, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- Since I read your comment above I've briefly searched for a concrete source for the official colors. You can look at page 186 of this UT system regulations document, which states "The official colors for the System shall be orange and white; provided, however, that a component institution may adopt one additional color to be used..." UT Arlington's additional color must then be blue, and I'm guessing each university can choose a particular shade of orange since all of them look to be different across the system. EMBaero (talk) 23:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)EMBaero
- Yes the UT System does impose the rule that a shade of orange is to be used by its member entities in all its official identity items (letterheads, logos etc...) and on certain parts of the academic regalia (my masters hood has orange and white on it). The silliness and obnoxiousness of this stipulation aside, there is considerable ambiguity in exactly what the requirements are for school colors themselves, specifically in regards to athletic teams and sports logos. It is also impractical: the UT System has at least five division schools who all must wear orange, and maybe another color?! There simply aren't enough color complements to orange aside from blue and green to give each university its own color scheme. UTA, UTEP and UTSA are all blue and orange. I think U of California does the same thing with gold, which is much more of a neutral color.
- Yes the UT System does impose the rule that a shade of orange is to be used by its member entities in all its official identity items (letterheads, logos etc...) and on certain parts of the academic regalia (my masters hood has orange and white on it). The silliness and obnoxiousness of this stipulation aside, there is considerable ambiguity in exactly what the requirements are for school colors themselves, specifically in regards to athletic teams and sports logos. It is also impractical: the UT System has at least five division schools who all must wear orange, and maybe another color?! There simply aren't enough color complements to orange aside from blue and green to give each university its own color scheme. UTA, UTEP and UTSA are all blue and orange. I think U of California does the same thing with gold, which is much more of a neutral color.
Anyway I added it back, mostly. I personally find it a point of pride that Arlington and Austin are two separate distinct institutions. Tee Owe (talk) 01:36, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
SLC West edit
Thanks for correcting my spelling on the SLC West Template, if you have any other contributions to make regarding the SLC I'm more than happy to receive them. I hope you like our Conference Nav box, it's one of the nicest in the country. ThomasHorn7 (talk) 13:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:UTAathleticslogo.gif edit
Thanks for uploading File:UTAathleticslogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The file File:Machbetatheta diagram.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused free use image with no clear use on the Wiki.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. fuzzy510 (talk) 08:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)