June 2009 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Barack Obama. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. TheFeds 04:32, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Niangua Bridge for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Niangua Bridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niangua Bridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 18:41, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Great West Models edit

 

The article Great West Models has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Finding sales sites, blogs, forums, and primary sources. Not seeing any indication of WP:NORG or WP:GNG here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 20:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Niangua Arm US 54 Bridge edit

 

The article Niangua Arm US 54 Bridge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable bridge, fails WP:GEOFEAT and WP:GNG. The source in the article looks self-published, and bridgehunters.com doesn't look reliable, either. The only mentions here are in brief statements in photo captions stating that the subjects were either next to the bridge or had their photos taken from the bridge. I'm getting a bunch of WP mirrors. There's some news hits for similarly named bridges, but since this bridge closed in 2000, and the news articles are more recent than that, I don't think they're the same bridge. Non-notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 20:32, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply