Welcome

edit

Welcome! Hello, Downloadmeh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions and helping out on various football articles. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Take a look at the Wikipedia:Cheatsheet and you'll get started in no time! Here are some other pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~) ; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If 'you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there or contact me on my talk page Again, welcome! Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)Calling All Athletics Fans! 11:37, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Refences

edit

If you are going to add refs at least use {{cite web |url= |title= |date= |publisher= }} ect. Thanks. Govvy (talk) 10:58, 12 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

^^Points to the above about citations.^^ Govvy (talk) 23:28, 5 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Apologies (if needed)

edit

Hi there MEH, VASCO from Portugal here,

If you happen to come across a "heated" summary in Alberto Botía (see here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alberto_Bot%C3%ADa&action=history), i would present first my apologies - if needed, and also state the following:

I really find it odd why everybody picks on the FC's of clubs (especially with Barcelona, another thing i don't quite get) then leaves the "REAL", when no club in the world is known as such, except Real Madrid, the other clubs with such denominations are referred to as Murcia, Zaragoza, Betis, etc. Yet, the "REAL" in boxes (and story) is allowed to stay.

I offered the suggestion of leaving the FC (and the REAL, and akin) in storyline, and thorough compress infobox to User:GiantSnowman (see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:GiantSnowman#Proposition_X), and he accepted, stating my edits were valid (please see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:NothingButAGoodNothing#FC_Barcelona_vs_Barcelona).

Sorry for any incovenience again, have a nice week, happy editing,

VASCO AMARAL - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 03:04, 22 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

September 2009

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Kim Christensen (goalkeeper). Thank you. Law Lord (talk) 11:34, 25 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:A Day to Remember2.jpg

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A Day to Remember2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 05:14, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Do you know...

edit

...what is necessary to reach before proceeding a disputed page move? Whytye (talk) 16:12, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Also, detailed instructions are there. Whytye (talk) 16:28, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pages (EP)

edit
 

The article Pages (EP) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't find significant coverage for this album.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Chill (talk) 19:19, 9 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

EP

edit

Read WP:MUSIC. The article needs multiple reliable sources with significant coverage. The only source that you added is a forum. Joe Chill (talk) 19:34, 9 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Robbie Keane's goal missing

edit

Hello. I'm italian so sorry for my bad English. Here a goal is missing: in august 2000 Keane has scored a goal in Supercoppa Italiana. The total career for Inter is 14 (3) and the total 489 (189). Can you correct the table? You can also see in the italian page. Sorry again for my English and thank you very much ^^ --Exorcist90 (talk) 15:29, 29 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Munich invitation

edit

Kingjeff (talk) 05:54, 15 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Rafael van der Vaart

edit

Hi. You might want to take a look at this discussion regarding Rafael van der Vaart. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:55, 2 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Downloadmeh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply