Welcome!

Hello, Dougjj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 09:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tanager and other photos

edit

Thanks for uploading the numerous nice photos! I have removed the two photos you had placed under the Ruby-crowned Tanager, as they both show a female Silver-beaked Tanager. Likewise, I removed the photo you had placed under the Southern Masked Weaver as it was a male Village Weaver, the photo placed under the Ruddy Ground-dove as it was a female Blue Ground-dove, the photo placed under Whitehead's Broadbill was a male Green Broadbill, and the two photos placed under Javan Trogon were Sumatran Trogons. While visiting your excellent gallery, I did find a few other issues: [1] and [2] both show a Pacific Hornero, [3] is a Blue-grey Tanager, [4] and [5] are a female and juvenile Violaceous Euphonia, [6], [7] and [8] all show a male Violaceous Euphonia, [9] and [10] are Black Kites, [11] is a Kikuyu White-eye, and [12] is a White-tailed Eagle. Among the mystery birds: [13] is a female Spangled Cotinga, [14] is a Rusty Laughingthrush of the mainland population now commonly called the Buffy Laughingthrush, [15] is a Sooty-headed Bulbul, and [16] is a Blue-grey Tanager. If you have any questions on the above, feel free to ask on my talk page. • Rabo³17:23, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the corrections and IDs Dougjj (talk) 21:56, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the heads up on the new photos in your gallery. A single comment about this and this photo. They're female Silver-beaked Tanagers. The female Ruby-crowned is much duller and browner, and with a more 'normal' bill without the enlarged lower mandible typical of Ramphocelus tanagers (you can compare the photo of the female in the current wiki article, Ruby-crowned Tanager). Great photos. I'll have to visit Singapore at some point. • Rabo³09:00, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Galleries

edit

Hi Doug, recently I've noticed that you've uploaded some excellent bird shots into 'Galleries' on numerous bird-articles, Currently there seems to be a movement to 'eradicate' these 'Galleries' from WP articles....something that I'm not really in favour of. See [17], basically most admins would like them all moved but I'm arguing that they can be useful if they display variations in plumages of races, sexes or maturity of bird-species. They also want to see a change in the title from 'Gallery' to a more descriptive one though I'm not sure that 'Various views and plumages' is very inspiring either. Might be interesting to discuss it further. Aviceda talk 21:16, 25 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Aviceda, as a birder you know that plumage for the same species has several influencing factors and varies considerably. Photos of birds from varying locations and genders, taken at different ages, seasons and angles can help to identify a particular species, without Wiki becoming essentially a generic host for online galleries. This is a good topic of conversation, perhaps on the discussion page of WikiProject Birds, unless there is a more suitable location? - Dougjj (talk) 00:29, 26 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Hi Doug, it has come up on WP:Birds before [18] and there has been discussion regarding it on Wikipedia generally (see my previous link) basically Galleries will be 'tolerated' if they include useful information or media but will be removed or a 'gallery-cleanup' stub added if they are just used as an 'image-repository'. Here's an example [19] Aviceda talk 04:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Hi Aviceda, that example is clearly excessive, which of the photos I posted do you suggest do not belong in the galleries and/or posted in the articles? - Dougjj (talk) 04:55, 26 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Doug, personally I believe if you have a reasonable image it should be allowed to stay but that it's unnecessary duplication that needs to be addressed, on the Indian Cormorant article there are 10+ images of birds feeding....surely one is enough? Aviceda talk 18:12, 26 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Aviceda, that gallery has been flagged for excessive gallery photos, it seems to have grown with 1 more feeding photo yesterday. Other than flagging it, is there a process for notifying the contributor or editing it by an admin or project member? - Dougjj (talk) 00:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

WikiProject Birds May newsletter

edit

The May 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

WikiProject Birds June newsletter

edit

The June 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

WikiProject Birds August newsletter

edit

The August 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Newsletter delivery by –xeno talk 02:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dove

edit

I would like to add where this dove was photographed in the image description on commons. Snowman (talk) 12:36, 4 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Science lovers wanted!

edit
Science lovers wanted!
 
Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 01:55, 17 April 2012 (UTC)Reply