March 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to History of KFC have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at History of Greenland. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: History of Greenland was changed by Dont block me pls (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953125 on 2021-03-24T02:40:38+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:40, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Principality of Sealand, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Principality of Sealand was changed by Dont block me pls (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961713 on 2021-03-24T02:42:45+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:42, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DrawWikiped(talk) 03:04, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dont block me pls (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

All I said was Dont block me pls and blocking me is the very thing you do? Dont block me pls (talk) 03:10, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I can see from this request and your contribution history just how this is going to go on from here, so I'm taking the admittedly extreme step of revoking your talk page access after this request, so that I might prevent you from inflicting another one on one of my fellow admins. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2021

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Drmies (talk) 01:13, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply