May 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Jonathan Deamer. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Shrinkhala Khatiwada, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Jonathan Deamer (talk) 06:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Shrinkhala Khatiwada. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Shrinkhala Khatiwada. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. See WP:BLP. Your reference does not validate the text. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Shrinkhala Khatiwada, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Negative information about a relative is not acceptable in this situation. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:45, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

It is not defamatory content. It is the fact backed by citation from credible sources. I am not sure why wikipedia is trying to cover the fact and portray only false information? This will raise questions against the credibility of wikipedia and attempting to remove facts posted by peer reviewers Donnond7 (talk) 20:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
See WP:BLPCRIME. Read the rest of that page for more info about biographies of living persons. Your edits are about an arrest, not a conviction, and is about her father-in-law, not her, so is disallowed. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:29, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Donnond7, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Kailash Sirohiya

edit

Hello Donnond! I wanted to speak with you about why your editing about him has been problematic. But I see that you've received many warnings about that already and you've neither responded to them, nor sought clarifications. However you have persisted. If you're here just to name and shame people close to Sirohiya, know that that's not going to work. If you are interested in becoming a Wikipedia editor, and wish to learn why the rest of us disagree with using Wikipedia for the purposes that you want to use it for, we can talk. In the meantime, I'd advise you to quit editing about Sirohiya and related people. Best, — Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Donnond7 repeatedly violating BLP rules, despite multiple warnings. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of the BLP policy after numerous warnings.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel (talk) 22:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply