Oh, and I’ve waited 6 months to edit Wikipedia again, create my home Paul he for my user account, and edit pages again such as Caity Lotz, Tiësto, Maisie Richardson-Sellers! And I’ve promised myself I’ll buy a bottle of Coke to celebrate my block expiring, but I won’t ‘til I can edit under my user name! Aargh!

Welcome

edit

Hello DonnieJack1 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Jalen D. Folf (talk) 23:08, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

September 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I noticed that you recently removed content from R3hab without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

2020 Laver Cup moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, 2020 Laver Cup, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:09, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

September 2019

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Elvis Presley, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:14, 23 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of User:DonnieJack1

edit
 

The page User:DonnieJack1 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spike Wilbury (talk) 13:32, 24 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

September 2019

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Avicii, you may be blocked from editing. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notice

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:DonnieJack1. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:37, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

September 2019

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Snoop Dogg. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Robvanvee 21:48, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

How long is my account going to be blocked for?

edit

I’m just wondering when I can use my account “DonnieJack1” again because “Bbb23” blocked my account for sock puppetry. Will I be able to edit again or not? That’s what I want to know. I’m kind of annoyed and upset. I’ve not done anything that I know of. DonnieJack1 (talk) 15:14, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Idk DonnieJack1 (talk) 15:16, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:2020 Laver Cup concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2020 Laver Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

September 2019 - March 2020 block

edit

Will I be able to edit Wikipedia ever again, or am I permanently blocked? Anyway, what is a CheckUser? DonnieJack1 (talk) 23:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DonnieJack1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

No reason given

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui  08:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock 2

edit

{unblock | reason=your reason here: Not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia}

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DonnieJack1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

Please stop wasting our time. WP:GAB will help you understand how to craft an unblock request. Any more time wasting and you'll lose access to this talk page. Yamla (talk) 10:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.