Docter1

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to University of Zambia Library, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: University of Zambia Library was changed by Docter1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.993549 on 2011-09-12T00:48:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:48, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Mat Mortlock

is my bro and also a person:)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mat Mortlock

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mat Mortlock requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Slon02 (talk) 00:57, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack shannon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jack shannon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --Σ _{^talkcontribs} 01:01, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Politics

they are alright but the carbon tax sucks right i vote abbot hes prety good dont vote for the red haired she beast!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

==

Bronze Age swords

The Bronze Age swords are 50 to 90 cm in size. The swords copper was alloyed with around 10-12% tin, making the sword strong so that the sword would bend rather than break in battle To stop over bending but the blades were shaped as to get the maximum strength. The edge was hardened by hammering so it would be a stronger cutting edge.

Bronze Age swords

The Bronze Age swords are 50 to 90 cm in size. The swords copper was alloyed with around 10-12% tin, making the sword strong so that the sword would bend rather than break in battle To stop over bending but the blades were shaped as to get the maximum strength. The edge was hardened by hammering so it would be a stronger cutting edge.

November 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Poborcze, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Poborcze was changed by Docter1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960199 on 2011-11-18T01:39:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:39, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Poborcze with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tiderolls 01:40, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Woodhenge with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Σ is not home (Leave message) 04:16, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello and welcome! It may not have been your intention, but you recently removed the entire contents of an article. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored. If there is a problem with the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page. If you think the article should be removed entirely, see the instructions for requesting deletion. Thank you! NickCT (talk) 03:44, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

March 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ray Kroc, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ray Kroc was changed by Docter1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894385 on 2012-03-06T22:56:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:56, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Matthew Fisher

Hi Matt SKYPE TONIGHT OR NO THUNDER

August 2012

Hello, I'm Malik Shabazz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Martin Luther King, Jr. because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: David H. Murdock was changed by Docter1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953516 on 2012-11-26T23:49:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:50, 26 November 2012 (UTC)