Djamie

Hello, Djamie. You have new messages at Djamie's talk page.
Message added 10:36, 26 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Welcome!

Hello, Djamie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Lemmy

A number of editors have added that idea in, no-one so far has been able to provide a reference for it though, are you able to do so? Thanks.--Alf ^melmac 07:11, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Transfield Services

Hi Djamie. It would appear that you're adding content to this page under the guise of being a representative of Transfield Corporate (Public) Affairs. If this is the case, I'd suggest a couple of tips. Firstly, you clearly identify yourself as that and establish a user profile called Transfield Services Corporate Public Affairs (or similar) and only use that profile for the purposes of correcting matters of fact made on Transfield Services. Secondly, I'd encourage you to become familiar with policies regarding sources and ensure that all statements are backed up by inline citations. I note that there is no reference to the claims you have made about the appointment of Goode, and a fair bit in this paragraph is not realy significant for a company of Transfield's size. As an example, you may care and look to Westpac, BHP Billiton, and News Corporation (or other listed Australian companies) on how their company has been described in the infobox. The reason for stating this is that I note you've included notable people that are not really notable, in Wikipedia terms (such as CFO, Company Sec, etc.) Also, the number of locations in the infobox means the number (eg = 26 or 477 or whatever the number of sites are), not the actual countries, which are covered under the areas served. I hope that you don't find my comments critical, but merely constructive feedback. As always, your feedback and comments are welcome and you can either respond here, or on my talk page. Cheers. Jherschel (talk) 13:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi Jherschel - thanks for your feedback. Yes - we will create an account for Transfield Corporate Affairs. R/e infobox - the only people I've added as significant are designated Company Officers, i.e. those who carry legal responsibility for decisions. I would have thought that at the very least, MD and CFO would be significant in that respect. Citations - noted. We will tidy the page up to Wikipedia's standards, and keep it as objective as possible. Have since tried to get an account in the name of Transfield Services corporate affairs, but wikipedia will not let us. So in interests of transparency - will continue to mark any edits we make as coming from the company. Using Westpac as basis for formatting etc.

No worries re feedback. I note your comments about legally responsible officers. As can be seen in the Centro Properties Group case, perhaps of more significant note than the employed officers of the company are its directors. Both Guido and Luca are listed for the clear relationship that they have with the co-founder. The inclusion of Dr Goode's presentation to investors may be considered by some in Wikipedia as not objective, as it is published by the author, namely Transfield Services Limited. What would be considered objective is media commentary on Dr Goode's presentation to investors in a respected business publication. Finally, may I suggest that you please use the four tildes to identify yourself which can be seen at the top of this page, just below your name. Like this→ Jherschel (talk) 10:35, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Lockheed Martin X-56a, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flutter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Djamie. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Djamie. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Djamie. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Djamie. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)