Tim Song (talk) 05:36, 31 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DivaOfDan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Guarantee you I'm not a sock of anyone. Please go ahead and checkuser if you don't believe me. But you can't bloick me because of an assumption - that's ridiculous - I've been harassed all night by this guy.

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CheckUser requests to "prove one's innocence" are never done as Checkuser cannot empirically prove the negative. —Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 09:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Just to note, this editor, using the IP address User: 208.88.120.87, spent 41 minutes last night undoing every one of my edits they could until they were blocked. This is after attacking me personally using User:208.88.120.88 on this AN/I thread. Beyond My Ken (talk) 15:06, 31 March 2010 (UTC)Reply