Welcome!

edit

Hello, Dinnerthendessert, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Dinnerthendessert/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Home Lander (talk) 01:16, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dinnerthendessert/sandbox

edit
 

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Dinnerthendessert/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Home Lander (talk) 01:16, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

March 2019

edit
 
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Bishonen | talk 01:40, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

PixieandEMW (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #24472 was submitted on Mar 27, 2019 02:07:30. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 02:07, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PixieandEMW (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sorry I couldn't figure out how to get to this page before and submit it here. So basically what happened was a friend of mine with a large food website has a wikipedia page. She submitted a quote for me to my publisher for an upcoming cookbook I am writing. In talking to her she said I should have a wikipedia page because the book can be added to the page as a resource and on the side of a google result for informational reasons. So, I made an account with my business name and business email (I really wasn't trying to hide anything here, honestly), and I used my friends accepted page as my gods honest truth template to just keep it short and simple. I didn't want to elaborate but just keep it clean and short so it could naturally sort of evolve over time? The other page I used was another large food website to reference for acceptable language. Please know I didn't set out to be spammy, it literally goes against who I am as a person. I am not looking to be unblocked because I have a pressing desire to edit articles. I really don't think that is a passion of mine for the future. I just love wikipedia and use it with almost every informational query I have on the internet and the idea that I violated the spirit of Wikipedia is just weighing heavy on me now. I just want to sort of wipe the slate clean here, maybe just delete this whole thing and just say hey, I promise this wasn't me trying to be a jerk, I was simply thinking this was acceptable for a large website to make a page about it as my site receives millions of views a month. Please accept my apologies.

Decline reason:

As you state you do not wish to edit, there is no need to unblock you, as being blocked does not prevent you from reading Wikipedia. If you later decide you want to edit something, you may request unblock at that time. Then, you can propose a username that complies with the username policy as described above, as well as address your inappropriate edits. 331dot (talk) 07:54, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would further add that your friend seems to seriously misunderstand the purpose of Wikipedia; Wikipedia has no interest in search results, merely providing information, or hosting "resources". This is an encyclopedia, which has article subjects shown with independent reliable sources with in depth coverage to meet Wikipedia's special definition of notability. We have no interest in what an article subject wants to say about itself or its own work. 331dot (talk) 07:54, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PixieandEMW (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I have reviewed all the pages regarding creating articles that are listed above. I have also talked to my friend in depth about this entire experience and assured her about what Wikipedia pages are meant to be. I understand the guidelines, the spirit of Wikipedia and will honor the rules moving forward. Sorry, I reread the instruction below again. In regards to the inappropriate edits, yes I completely understand the point of Wikipedia and why the article was marked for deletion. I see that the information created is not in line with what a Wikipedia page should be, full stop.Dinnerthendessert (talk) 00:06, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You still haven't told us what you plan to write about instead. Yamla (talk) 13:14, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • I have globally renamed Dinnerthendessert to PixieandEMW, and someone else will review your unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:10, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply