Devourer09

Talkback

Hello, Devourer09. You have new messages at 1234r00t's talk page.
Message added 20:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Of course. It'd be my pleasure to adopt you. Mr. R00t ^Talk 20:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

You have new messages

Waiting for you at the Help Desk. Warm regards. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ _―Œ ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 18:26, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Creation of article

I think your ready to create some articles now. I'd suggest finding a topic that you are interested at WP:Requested articles or just finding a subject your interested in that doesn't have an article. Be sure that it conforms to our notability guidelines and doesn't break any other laws. If you feel nervous you can use the Article wizard which gives you a step by step guide to writing the article. If you need any help writing it feel free to ask me and I'll help out. Mr. R00t ^Talk 23:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Devourer09. You have new messages at 1234r00t's talk page.
Message added 17:39, 18 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hebdomad

I removed your speedy tag on this article, which you tagged per CSD A3. WP:CSD states "Any article (other than disambiguation pages, redirects, or soft redirects)" may be deleted under this criteria, and this was clearly a valid Wiktionary link. If you have any questions regarding deletions or Wikipedia in general, feel free to drop me a line. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 22:03, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I wasn't aware that was a valid page. Thanks for fixing that. Devourer09 22:05, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Average frustrated chump

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Average frustrated chump, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 16:49, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about removing all of those tags. I removed the ones that definitely should not be there this time. Devourer09 17:58, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Create something...

...rather important. Could you add some text (anything) to User:Devourer09/EditCounterOptIn.js? It allows other people to view important information about your account. ♫Mr. R00t ^Talk♫ 03:47, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Done. Sorry I didn't respond sooner. I didn't have internet connectivity for a little bit. Devourer09 (t·c) 00:56, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Twinkle feature

Since you supported the addition of this feature previously, you might be interested in this thread. Thanks. SnottyWong ^speak 21:37, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Would you care to explain further on Talk:Reconstruction Era of the United States?

Lots of drive-by tags are self-explanatory, but when an editor drops a POV tag at the top of a lengthy and complex article, especially one on a somewhat controversial subject, that editor owes others an insight as to why such a position is taken. If you don't choose to offer some explanation, I'm not going to feel much concern about choosing to revert the tag. BusterD (talk) 18:47, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

I couldn't decide if the tag should be POV or essay-like. I'll leave a message on the talk page. Devourer09 (t·c) 18:51, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! I have no doubt in your good faith, but the article covers a lot of ground. I'm sure other involved editors will want to be able to address or satisfy your specific concern. BusterD (talk) 18:53, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Of course. I was just being lazy and not making the changes myself and kinda strapped for time atm. Devourer09 (t·c) 18:56, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Cleanup of Comparison of open source software hosting facilities

Hi. A year ago you tagged the Comparison of open source software hosting facilities articles with {{cleanup}}. But I can’t find your reasons for doing so, neither in the history nor on the talk page. Can you please explain what you think should be cleaned up in that article, and write it down on the talk page there? Thank you. --Vasiliy Faronov (talk) 12:47, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

I don't remember why I tagged it with cleanup, so I just removed that tag. A quick browse through the article and it looks mostly fine to me. Devourer09 (t·c) 19:49, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Devourer09! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Devourer09. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Devourer09. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)