Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Digital microscope. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: digital microscope

edit

Hirox may not be considered reliable source for their own priority. Please also understand that your edits of that article are excessively promotional to Hirox and other companies, which contradicts to basic WP policies. You keep editing within the same spirit for already quite some time. Please do reconsider. Materialscientist (talk) 22:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes, non-commercial spirit of wikipedia complicates referencing of commercial-product articles, but I believe DM is not such a topic. For example, google books search returns 243 free book on that. Certainly many are unusable, but still .. Materialscientist (talk) 23:10, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. When you recently edited Digital microscope, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 27 January 2012 (UTC)Reply