Dermalogica

Dermalogica

A tag has been placed on Dermalogica, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Dermalogica and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Yourname (talk) 23:11, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

The recent edit you made to Dermalogica has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see this page for instructions. Thank you. Jojhutton (talk) 23:18, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Dermalogica. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Marek.69 ^talk 00:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

• User Dermalogica, the sole author, blanked the page. This is commonly interpreted as a request for deletion as per {{db-g7}}. — Athaenara ✉ 00:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

re: Your Message

Hi Dermalogica, I've left a response to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 ^talk 00:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

FYI conflict of interest guideline

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Dermalogica, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. — Athaenara ✉ 00:46, 16 April 2009 (UTC)