User talk:DenSportgladeSkåningen/Archive 1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Boing! said Zebedee in topic 2017

2017 edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

DenSportgladeSkåningen (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

English
It has now been more than two years since I recently applied for unblocking. I hope it's okay that I apply again after such a long time. Because I was blocked almost four years ago.
I have no bad intentions, for example, in Swedish-language wikipedia I have done over 22,000 edits and created over 3000 articles (including redirects) and created a large number of templates for various sporting events. I'm also a rollbacker on svwp, I have also restored strange edits in language versions of wikipedia I never thought I would visit (zhwp, viwp, mswp and probably some more). Sometimes I'm also active in Danish and Norwegian wikipedia. Overall, I've done over 23,500 edits on wikipedia. I apologize for my behavior in the previous applications for unblocking, but I was frustrated. I have also now understood that guidelines and rules are different in different language versions.

If I'm still blocked after this, I want the blocking to have an end date.
(Today, I understand English much better than I did two years ago, or just a year ago even. Before that, I was not willing to learn English, but it has changed and now I want to learn more English.).

Swedish (If there is any admin here that understands Swedish)
Det har nu gått mer än två år sedan jag senast ansökte om avblockering, jag hoppas det är okej att jag ansöker igen efter så lång tid. Eftersom jag blev blockerad för snart fyra år sedan.
Jag har inga dåliga avsikter, som exempel, på svenskspråkiga Wikipedia har jag gjort över 22 000 redigeringar och skapat över 3000 artiklar (inkluderar omdirigeringar och mallar för olika sportevenemang). Jag är även tillbakarullare på svwp, samt att jag har återställt en del konstiga redigeringar på språkversioner av Wikipedia jag aldrig trodde jag skulle besöka (zhwp, vivwp, mswp och säkert några fler). Ibland är jag även aktiv på danskspråkiga och norskspråkiga Wikipedia. Totalt har jag gjort över 23 500 redigeringar på Wikipedia. Jag ber om ursäkt för mitt beteende i tidigare ansökningar för avblockering, men jag var frustrerad. Jag har nu förstått att riktlinjer och regler skiljer sig på de olika språkversionerna av Wikipedia.

Om jag fortfarande är blockerad efter detta, då vill jag att min blockering åtminstone får ett slutdatum.

(Idag förstår jag engelska mycket bättre än vad jag gjorde för två år sedan, eller för bara ett år sedan. Innan det var jag inte villig att lära mig engelska, men det har ändrats och nu vill jag lära mig mer engelska). DenSportgladeSkåningen (talk) 16:10, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Accept reason:

It's a long time since you were blocked, and you appear to understand and accept what you did wrong at the time. Your positive contributions to the Swedish Wikipedia are testament to your desire to help us improve the project, and I'm happy to unblock your account and welcome you back for a fresh start.

(Normally, as is customary, I'd have consulted with the blocking admin first, but they have not been active since 2015.) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:59, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

2015 edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DenSportgladeSkåningen (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Well, I am in a position to require that the blockage is removed.. Since I have not done what I accused.
I do not know how long I've been blocked. But 10 months?! In at least 10 months, I have been innocently blocked. Why should you continue to block me for something I(!!!) have not done? I have no bad intentions. Again, I demand that the blockage is removed, then I am innocent! DenSportgladeSkåningen (talk) 17:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Yelling at people did not help anyone to get unblocked sooner - rather the opposite, when they lost the ability to make unblock requests. I am declining this request because it does not address the reason why you were blocked, the reason being here. Because this is your third request that contains yelling instead of a rational explanation why it wasn't you, it is safe to assume that your next unblock request will be your last one here. Max Semenik (talk) 07:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

You mean that I will continue to be blocked for something I have not done? It's not right. DenSportgladeSkåningen (talk) 17:33, 19 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would suggest not editing the English Wikipedia for about six months, allow yourself to calm down and maybe work on the Wikipedia for your native language, since your level of English proficiency may be a strike against you in terms of getting unblocked. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 02:01, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
I do this. But how can I calm down when I'm already calm?
I was going to hold me to fix small errors in the articles. I also retrieves some information from the English Wikipedia, and it would facilitate enormously the blockage is removed. For example, tables are easier to copy without blocking. DenSportgladeSkåningen (talk) 11:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DenSportgladeSkåningen (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

multiple IPs to edit war?! No, I(!!) haven't done it.. I'm still blocked for something I didn't do.... I demand to the blockage ceased! DenSportgladeSkåningen (talk) 19:38, 13 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You aren't in a position to demand anything. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:24, 15 August 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DenSportgladeSkåningen (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What have I done? Why have I been blocked for nothing?! DenSportgladeSkåningen (talk) 17:47, 13 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You're blocked for using multiple IPs to edit war. PhilKnight (talk) 18:37, 13 August 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.