24 January 2022 edit

I noticed that you made some edits on Tulunadu and South Canara articles. You have just edited those just to promote a language on Wikipedia and that would be a vandalism and you haven't cited any reliable sources also. So please keep in mind that this Wikipedia not Twitter here you have to cite sources for the edits you make.TuluveRai123 (talk) 17:19, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Great! edit

Kannada is official language of the region. You're not mentioning that. Also mind that Kundagannada and Arebhashe are dialects of kannada and not language. Reg proofs- there is enough of proof I can add to above points, don'twant to waste my time doing shitty politics..also there were several claims in article flagged by wiki since you didn't mention references.

Hope you respect facts, not your fantasy and politics! I truly support Tulu should be added to 8th schedule and given importance in all government offices in Karnataka, but definitely not support demining the kannada speaking population in the district.

Try not to teach me what's wiki okay :)))!

Also, if you're including census data...including old and NEW or recent one too. Do not mis lead, or ready to get whole page flagged. See you! Deltakannada (talk) 03:12, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022 edit

  Your edit to 0 has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Text matches https://sanskritlinguistics.blogspot.com/2013/04/. Although there is no obvious copyright notice, it at least requires attribution as a public-domain source. Blogs are also normally not reliable sources. Certes (talk) 23:05, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply