User talk:AmandaNP/Archives/2010/June
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
CfD nomination of Category:E-mail servers
I have nominated Category:E-mail servers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. PleaseStand (talk) 02:12, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010
- News and notes: New puzzle globe, feature for admins, Israel's "Wikipedia Bill", unsourced bios declining
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Saints
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Re: SPI Clerk Trainnee
I could train you, but not for next couple of weeks as I have various real-life obligations to undertake. And I won't go on IRC because it's a hotbed for counterproductive drama so my preference would be over msn. OhanaUnitedTalk page 20:52, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, let me know when it is a good time, I will email you my MSN soon. -- /DeltaQuad.alt|Notify Me\ 15:32, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Proposal at WikiProject Star Trek
Hi MWOAP, I have made a proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Star Trek#Proposal and thought you might be interested. Thanks, --Alpha Quadrant (talk) 20:18, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Working Looking into. -- /DeltaQuad.alt|Notify Me\ 15:32, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Nice vandalism alert box
Hi MWOAP, I just wanted to tell you I like the vandalism defcon box you made and that I am using it on my userpage. --Alpha Quadrant (talk) 23:57, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note. -- /DeltaQuad.alt|Notify Me\ 15:32, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Admin coaching
Hi MWOAP,
I've recently returned from a fairly lengthy wikibreak, and while I am refreshed and once again in the mood to edit, I'm afraid I just don't have the enthusiasm or patience left to continue admin coaching my current students. I've enjoyed working with you recently, and I'd still be happy to answer any specific questions you may have, but I'm afraid I just can't be an effective mentor for the time being.
Obviously this isn't a reflection on you or your efforts so far. I wish you the best of luck should you run for RfA in the future.
Regards,
Juliancolton (talk) 19:51, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, I think I will just wait another while till a nomination comes along. -- /DeltaQuad.alt|Notify Me\ 15:32, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010
- Photography: Making money with free photos
- News and notes: Wikimedians at Maker Faire, brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Zoo
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
New user
Hi MWOAP! Thanks for your lovely welcome on my user page. As well as hoping you might have time to cast an eye over the copyedit work I have carried out since joining I would also like to know how it is possible to know how to know when a message I have placed on someone elses talk page is responded to? Do I have to elect to watch the page? If so, then please let me know on my user page as I have NOT elected to watch your page. --SciHound (talk) 11:12, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Working Looking into. Usually, like I will right now, I will put a talkback notice using WP:Twinkle on your talkpage. -- /DeltaQuad.alt|Notify Me\ 15:32, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Is this why ClueBot is stopped?
I noticed ClueBot reverted one of MWOAPBot's edits as possible vandalism and gave a "Warning #1". mechamind90 21:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010
- From the team: Changes to the Signpost
- News and notes: "Pending changes" trial, Chief hires, British Museum prizes, Interwiki debate, and more
- Free Travel-Shirts: "Free Travel-Shirts" signed by Jimmy Wales and others purchasable
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Comedy
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Bot
Hi - Have you noticed your bot triggering this edit filter? 7 23:29, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
IOException in Updater.KillTempDir
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
ResolvedYou have an old version of AWBUpdater (2.0.0.6). Current version is 2.0.0.7. Go to http://toolserver.org/~awb/snapshots/ and download a new version of AWB along with a new updater and make a clean install, please. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 23:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks!
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
ResolvedThanks for pointing me in the right direction to upload an image to Wikipedia to have it placed in the oceans page. Thanks! :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.114.128.183 (talk) 03:12, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Reply to Response
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
ResolvedThanks for the response. I have posted this argument on society sports and culture, WP:Football and asked for neutral editors opinion. Replies from the society have agreed with the fact that the section is overweight and the proposal was along the right lines. Where do I go from here. The article and section really needs neutral editors (editors who have never really edited the page before) to look over it and give strong opinions about which way to go. Thanks for any advice and guidance in advance.(Monkeymanman (talk) 20:29, 15 June 2010 (UTC))
- I just saw that this user was on ANI regrading disruptive edits. If you get a 1 or 2 users siding with you, and no opposes, then I would say change it back. -- /DeltaQuad|Notify Me\ 20:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- He is asking me to revert the section back to the way it was before he was blocked. Another user shrunk a statement within the section due to recentism and undue weight (aswell as the fact that it had its own article) it was not opposed and he immediately tried to revert the article after unblock. Even if another 2 or 3 users said that the section should be condensed he would still argue that it is necessary to keep it as full as possible. How do I get neutral editors to engage in strong discussion with this. Do I need to open mediation and how do I go about it. Thanks again(Monkeymanman (talk) 20:49, 15 June 2010 (UTC))
- Ok, not quite sure what you are saying right now. First if you haven't already, take it to a noticeboard. If that fails, go for Informal Mediation. That first one will allow non-involved users to comment. -- /DeltaQuad|Notify Me\ 22:44, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- He is asking me to revert the section back to the way it was before he was blocked. Another user shrunk a statement within the section due to recentism and undue weight (aswell as the fact that it had its own article) it was not opposed and he immediately tried to revert the article after unblock. Even if another 2 or 3 users said that the section should be condensed he would still argue that it is necessary to keep it as full as possible. How do I get neutral editors to engage in strong discussion with this. Do I need to open mediation and how do I go about it. Thanks again(Monkeymanman (talk) 20:49, 15 June 2010 (UTC))
The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Resolved- News and notes: Pending changes goes live, first state-funded Wikipedia project concludes, brief news
- In the news: Hoaxes in France and at university, Wikipedia used in Indian court, Is Wikipedia a cult?, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
ResolvedCan this GA review be completed in the next day or two? Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:27, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- I probally should have noted this on the review. I currently can't finish it as I said on the nominators talkpage. I am currently in exam period so I might be able to have finished in a few days, but not just one or two. -- /DeltaQuad|Notify Me\ 14:03, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Done Another user took over. -- /DeltaQuad|Notify Me\ 02:24, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Erich Mielke
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Resolvedreference on Mielke talk page, thanksSartoresartus (talk) 05:12, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
AfC submissions location
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
ResolvedJust a note, the correct location for Articles for Creation submissions is on the project talk page. I'm messaging you about this because of this move. Anyway, cya around! Netalarmtalk 23:48, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
ResolvedI have replied to your comment. - 98.92.57.226 (talk) 13:55, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
BLPPROD of Yuri Kuznetsov (born 1961) Russian Artist
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
ResolvedPlease be careful to note external links in an article before tagging it with a BLPPROD. That tag is only if there are no references at all in the article). Thanks! Hobit (talk) 02:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
RfA
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
ResolvedThank you very much for your contribution to my Rfa. I have made a comment about it at User talk:JamesBWatson#Your Request for Adminship which you are, of course, very welcome to read if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Resolved- Sister projects: Picture of the Year results declared on Wikimedia Commons
- News and notes: Collaboration with the British Museum and in Serbia, Interaction with researchers, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U2
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Clear Submission Requirements
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Resolved(Loreensherman (talk) 20:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)).Thank you for your review of the submission on the article "Four Tests Formulaic Communication Passes in Economics" and stated that you "can't totally tell what you are trying to communicate her[e]". Therefore, to assist you I wonder if, the forces affecting economics are understood. Is this what I need to clarify? Or do you want more clarification on the point that all four tests confirm the significance of Formulaic Communication. To me, the article clearly proved that there are four key economic forces that affect today's market that in The Industrial Age were defined differently. This difference in the foundation of thought and knowledge has led to a paradigm shift. I wonder if this shift is what is not understood in the article. Could you offer more specific feedback. I feel that this explanation offers the clarity you are looking for and if I include it in resubmitting the article if it would meet the criteria expected in the Wikipedia submissions. Please advise me on how to proceed and what else may be required. Thanks for your timeliness and consideration. Loreen Sherman. Loreensherman (talk) 20:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Kidding, right?
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
ResolvedLiving? A new world record! 1846 to, uh, 2010 is a longggggggg time. —fetch·comms 21:40, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Wikidesk
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Resolved- Please check your email for incoming. It's just a reminder, thanx Mlpearc pull my chain 'Tribs 04:49, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 15:57, 28 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010
- Objectionable material: Board resolution on offensive content
- In the news: Wikipedia controlled by pedophiles, left-wing trolls, Islamofascists and Communist commandos?
- Public Policy Initiative: Introducing the Public Policy Initiative
- WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Ships
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News