DaviesBridge

Talk and I'll listen. Let's go talkatives.

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, DaviesBridge! Thank you for your contributions. I am SD0001 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! SD0001 (talk) 07:08, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

SD0001 Thank you. Happy to be part of this community DaviesBridge (talk) 08:39, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

December

Eli Lake: That wasn't vandalism. The Lake page is garbage, the result of years of struggles between editors who want to bash Lake and those who want to fluff of Lake's reputation. None of it shows a neutral point of view, and most of it is trivia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.86.135.251 (talk) 06:07, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

72.86.135.251 You can't just remove almost everything written on an article. I won't let you. DaviesBridge ^Chat 06:15, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

If it's garbage, why keep it? That's idiotic. I don't know who you are that you think you're the arbiter of what does/doesn't merit inclusion; but you didn't make any kind of judgment based on merit, you just made a knee jerk reaction. I spent considerable time looking into what was included and why; then I consulted others asking somebody else to edit the garbage out; then I was told that I should do it myself. Which I do. And you show up making insulting comments because I bothered to take out the trash.05:01, 12 December 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.86.136.23 (talk)

72.86.136.23 Please read WP:CON. DaviesBridge ^Chat 12:24, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Please read what I said. You didn't make a judgment based on merits, you just reverted as a knee jerk reaction...in defense of garbage that was cobbled together not out of "consensus", but among people edit warring over Lake' reputation. I have wasted far more time on Lake's page than it deserves. If you want to leave it the mess that it is, go ahead, you win, hurray for garbage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.86.134.243 (talk) 04:54, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Your Nenny B Article

Thanks for creating this piece. Celestina007 (talk) 19:02, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Celestina007 Thanks for stopping by. DaviesBridge ^Chat 20:35, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Elis Miele for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elis Miele is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxanne Allison Baeyens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Tajiya Eikura Sahay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tajiya Eikura Sahay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxanne Allison Baeyens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:31, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Gabriela Batistela for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabriela Batistela is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxanne Allison Baeyens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:34, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Kobe Cools for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kobe Cools is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kobe Cools until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Are you engaging in undisclosed paid editing?

Hello DaviesBridge. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Victor Ngumah, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:DaviesBridge. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=DaviesBridge|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. I have left this message because your edit pattern and the contents of the non notable promotional named article are consistent with editors engaging in undisclosed paid editing. Celestina007 (talk) 21:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Victor Ngumah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Victor Ngumah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Ngumah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nikolaih^☎️📖 04:18, 15 November 2021 (UTC)