February 2017 edit

Welcome! edit

 
A cup of warm tea to welcome you!

Hello, Davidsclapp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to continue. Some useful pages to visit are:

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. We're so glad you're here! 7&6=thirteen ()

Your submission at Articles for creation: Preparators (February 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Preparators concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Preparators, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:07, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Conservation and restoration of panel paintings edit

Hi, I'm Ajpolino. Davidsclapp, thanks for creating Conservation and restoration of panel paintings!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. An encyclopedia article should describe the topic, not lay out the author's opinions on them. For example the first sentence of the article "TOPIC can be difficult since..." is an opinion. Looking at other articles you'll see generally the format "TOPIC is (a description of what the actual topic is)", followed by history of TOPIC, etc. If you could rewrite parts of this article so that it is more encyclopedic and less of a personal essay, it could be a great asset to the encyclopedia. If you have questions, ask at WP:TEAHOUSE. Happy editing!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Ajpolino (talk) 22:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply