January 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm JimRenge. Your recent edit(s) to the page Religion in Bosnia and Herzegovina appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 11:35, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Religion in Albania, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 11:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hindusm, you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone 11:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in Kosovo. Spiderone 11:46, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Hindusm edit

 

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Hindusm, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Spiderone 11:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Pie Chart edit

 

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Template:Pie Chart, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Spiderone 11:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:04, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply