Daniel vic
Daniel vic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
am a new editor, I haven't learnt to be a pro like you the top men & women on wikipedia, also am not advertising or promoting anything, am trying to help the encyclopedia to my best of knowledge Daniel vic (talk) 21:48, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm not buying it. Your edits and edit summaries reek of either incompetent deception or just gross incompetence. You were spamming, and always were spamming despite claiming the opposite. MER-C 09:22, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Daniel vic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
am sorry if I spammed, I was trying my best to become a better and auto confirmed author, pls lift the ban on me I won't edit again if u want me to....but I have been studying Wikipedia for quite sometime but I don't know why my edits ate always reverted CU's I make use of good sources sometimes, but because I don't have a history on Wikipedia, its all reverted and marked as spam, I have given reference to about 5 different website that had good articles but non was left, so I don't really understand this great platform anymore....truely am so sorry if I spammed Daniel vic (talk) 11:46, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:30, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Daniel vic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Am really sorry about my edits, but am really not advertising or promoting anything! Non of my products are here, am actually just an seo expert nothing more!
Am just trying my best to be better & the worse that keeps happening is that the websites I use as sources are marked as spam too & some has spam reports. I really trying my best to understand this platform, its really not easy!
But pls unban me, if you don't too, its okay by me...I deserve to get this punishments but my fear is that those websites that got spam reports because of my edits, could it not affect the websites?
Anyways, am really sorry, am maybe I would have to stop wikipedia edit as it seems not easy with too much pressure! So sorry! Best regards from me sir...
Daniel vic (talk) 12:03, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Please read WP:SPAMMER. Also, please tell your friends that spamming Wikipedia is a quick way to get your domain added to blacklists all over the internet. Find some other website to spam. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:30, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
My Appeal edit
Daniel vic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I, Daniel vic agree to the bots that blocked me from disrupting Wikipedia. I acknowledge the reason for my ban & it's because I spammed/advertised external links. When I joined Wikipedia 6 months ago, I had the thoughts that within a little time I will become good at it but then I discovered it requires lots of edits, so I usually will edit a post and there are5 sites I often visit and they are always updated so I will use their links for edits but I didn't read Wikipedia terms before joining do I have been spamming links without even knowing. Then I realized that much later a spam report was created for some sites whoms links I spammed by the spam bots thst was when I dawned on me. So I felt because I spam those link, I better start using other Nigerian top sites links and that was what ended me on the ban beczuse adding them was irrelevant and would not help Wikipedia. So because of me, I have caused websites to get bad Reputation on Wikipedia because they have Spam reports which am feeling real bad about, I actually do care. Do please admins unblock me, I promise to serve Wikipedia my best, no more spamming I promise, I will take my time to learn via the tea house group to become a better editor Daniel vic (talk) 06:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You say "I have been spamming links without even knowing", and earlier claimed you are an SEO expert. I don't see how those can both be true. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:31, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Appeal for spamming edit
Daniel vic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please accept my deepest apology for breaking one of Wikipedia terms which is “spamming”. It was a serious mistake on my part and very unprofessional). I know my spam edits greatly angered the admins because my edits were unecessary in making an better enclyopedia like Wikipedia. I made a spams, for which I am sincerely sorry. I failed on my path for not reading the terms before joining also, I didmt read the step to step guide on being a Wikipedia editor, but now am currently researching and learn how to really be a better editor and because of my bad behavior of rushing to do things, I made series of spams because I was a dummy and that caused my initail blocke. I feel so sorry. Please know that I've taken the necessary measures to ensure this won't occur again, and I will stand by my promise. I let you (the admins) and myself down, and I deeply regret the aftermath. I've started reading Wikipedia guides and editing rules to become better for example https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ten_simple_rules_for_editing_Wikipedia and many more I want to cover. please reconsider and unblock me, I would to serve better. Thank youDaniel vic (talk) 7:49 am, 7 September 2020, Monday (14 days ago) (UTC−5)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. signed, Rosguill talk 00:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please unblock me edit
Daniel vic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Daniel vic ". The reason given for Daniel vic's block is: " Spam / advertising -only account - spamming links to external sites".</nowiki>
Decline reason:
This is a direct block so you need provide a reason for your request. only (talk) 21:46, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Daniel vic (talk) 20:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
October 2020 edit
Daniel vic, you are not allowed to remove declined unblock requests from your user talk page while you are still blocked. You are also not allowed to create new accounts. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 18:17, 6 October 2020 (UTC)