Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Scully

edit

Hello DanSkull,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Daniel Scully for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. {C  A S U K I T E  T} 19:47, 5 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Scully

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Daniel Scully, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theopolisme (talk) 19:47, 5 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2013

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel Scully. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. {C  A S U K I T E  T} 19:47, 5 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • If you want to know why it was deleted, read:
JohnCD (talk) 21:59, 5 October 2013 (UTC)Reply