January 2015 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of law enforcement agencies in Tennessee has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kormoran (disambiguation). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kormoran (disambiguation) was changed by Da13rlene An3dre2ws1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.945484 on 2015-01-24T22:24:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:24, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tour of Rwanda, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Tour of Rwanda was changed by Da13rlene An3dre2ws1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903487 on 2015-01-24T22:25:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:25, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to French toast, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Darrell_Greenwood (talk) 22:41, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BenLinus1214. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Walter Becker because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! BenLinus1214talk 22:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vanessa Huppenkothen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. BenLinus1214talk 22:44, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Edit summaries etc. edit

I noticed your edit to Direct2D and my first thought was to revert it as an unexplained removal, but it seems a good edit cleaning up some unnecessary trivia and improper sourcing. Still though you will find your edits challenged much less often if you use proper WP:edit summaries; even just a few words explaining what you've done. Otherwise your edits are much more likely to be questioned, and not every editor (or bot) has time to check every edit in detail to deduce what your intention is.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 22:50, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

January 2015 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Widr (talk) 22:54, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 23:00, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Reply