User talk:DIYeditor/Sashko1999

Argean let's use this page to discuss any refinements to the ANI report so we don't spam your talk page. I am going to add diffs right now. To demonstrate NOTHERE I think we need to show he is only here to push a certain agenda, which you have of a better idea of than I. —DIYeditor (talk) 21:05, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Argean I will take a break and let you work on this for a while so we don't have edit conflicts. It pays to go through his talk page (he removed some times) and edit history. —DIYeditor (talk) 21:12, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

DIYeditor Thanks, I'll also start working on diffs separately. Btw, I'm sure that there are other users that know this user well enough and I suppose that have some things to say for Sashko1999, because I basically discovered him last week at Talk: Macedonia

If there are any people who have a clear interest we can make a list of pings, I don't think that would be canvassing. —DIYeditor (talk) 22:13, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Argean I have started editing article again, and made more sections. You may want to save your edits more often so we can work in tandem on this, but the separate sections should help if they are edited individually. —DIYeditor (talk) 22:36, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm saving separately the relevant diffs. I'll start adding them. Argean (talk) 22:44, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

I am lazy and just give a link to the diff rather than use the template, is there an easy way to make a correct template from the copied links? —DIYeditor (talk) 22:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I have no idea. I just copy and paste the numbers on the top of the diff pages. Basically there is an awfully big number of diffs that we could add... Argean (talk) 23:19, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Yeah there are a lot of diffs possible. We just need to establish something basic for each point. —DIYeditor (talk) 23:30, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Agree. His editing history is also very revealing of his agenda... Argean (talk) 23:37, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

We need a diff for "According to the editor everyone else is wrong and doesn't understand their point" but otherwise this looks like it's ready to go after we give a good review. —DIYeditor (talk) 00:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Ok let me know when you think this is ready and I will post it. —DIYeditor (talk) 00:23, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Yeah ready! Go on and post it! Argean (talk) 00:42, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Done. I think we will see action from this. Thanks for working with me! —DIYeditor (talk) 01:04, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Yep, this looks very good. No problem! Thanks for all the help because I'm quite inexperienced in filing official reports in wikipedia. Argean (talk) 01:30, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

We did a little bit more detail and I added more structure (sections) than many reports but we needed to paint a full picture. —DIYeditor (talk) 01:39, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

I guess that will be helpful, because this guy is not an obvious case of vandal, but rather a sneaky type that tries to manipulate things and bend the rules to push their POV, but when eventually confronted shows the disruptive nature of their behavior. Anyway, thanks once more! Argean (talk) 01:47, 4 February 2019 (UTC)