Cylonhunter

fook me

fook myself and wikipedia--Cylonhunter 16:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

that is just sick ,Spiderman--DvDknight 16:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

was up?

Hey this is DvDknight just sayin' was up? Look at the new page I created.neck hardIsn't it great for Gaffney High School? See ya--DvDknight 17:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Cylonhunter 08:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC)Cylonhunter 17:16, 24 January 2007 (UTC)Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Mythology of Star Wars with George Lucas & Bill Moyers article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than (10) days are automatically archived to User:Cylonhunter/Nov. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

,

Feel free to re-submit a new version of the article. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:NPA, WP:CIV

Regarding your recent warning on User talk:C-Dew, please take note of our key policies on civility and no personal attacks. Your wording was uncalled for, and your recent contributions don't suggest anything helpful, either. Your opinions on recent requests for adminship have been made without any support, and you've not made an effort to source your additions to Wikipedia. You may want to read WP:POLICY before continuing. Cheers, – Chacor 14:38, 18 January 2007 (UTC) Very sorry this particulary user who calls himself C-Dew is a vandal and has a blantant disregard for Wikipedias spamming policy.

Your edit to Dev920's RFA

When you voted oppose you perhaps inadvertently deleted another editor's support vote. Please exercise more caution when editing pages, particularly ones as important as RFA nomination. Here is the diff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffpw (talk • contribs) Yes I did it was purely accidental thoughCylonhunter 17:16, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Thanks for your support in my RfA. I've felt it best to withdraw on this occasion and think about the good advice I received. Thanks again, Jakew 19:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Autoblock

{{unblock-auto|1=71.85.48.65|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Cylonhunter1227". The reason given for Cylonhunter1227's block is: "troll account".|3=Future Perfect at Sunrise}} As you may know my screenname is very similar to Cylonhunter1227's but that is not me. My big sister thinks that it is funny to vandalize and likes to use account names similar to mine to do it.Cylonhunter 05:37, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, somehow there's just too much suspicious activity going on.

• Cylonhunter1227 (talk · contribs) creates a troll RFA (Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Nocturnalnerd1227) proposing a vandal-only account, Nocturnalnerd1227 (talk · contribs). You stumble into Cylonhunter1227's autoblock.
• Earlier, you were affected by an autoblock of another vandal, Bandofgold (talk · contribs). Incidentally, Bandofgold's silly unblock excuse ("forgot to logout at school and somebody used by account to vandalise") [1] is almost exactly the same as that used by Nocturnalnerd1227 ([2]), and also quite similar to the excuse you're using now ("big sister").
• There was a second troll RFA nomination yesterday, a self-nom by ColtsXLI (talk · contribs). I block the troll. ColtsXLI makes no further edits, no unblock request, but who do they turn to in private to complain of the block, and who turns up on his talk page and mine to advocate for them? ([3], [4]) You.

Care to explain? Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

First off as you can see I am in good standing. Second of all we all go to the same school so as you probably can imagine we all occasionally use the schools computer to log on to wikipedia which explains how I got auto blocked in the first place. Third off since you mentioned nocturnalnerd1227's talk page his is nothing like mine. I am at least smart enough to log out of my account however apparantly my sister is smart enough to know what my screen name is and how to emulate it. Being the only person in my school with an account that is in good standing and the only one that knows how to format for unblocking ColtsXLI came to me when he was blocked.During lunch tommorrow I will show him how to do that. However seeing as he as done some pretty lame stuff I seriously doubt that he will get unblocked. Now if you would please unblock me so that I can help stop editors that are actually vandalizing wikipedia.

Seriously though dude if you really think that I might be a threat to wikipedia take a look at my edits. They aren't great but they aren't vandalism.Cylonhunter

07:54, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Forgot to mention that when ColtsXLI discovered that he was blocked the bell rang and he had to log out at school. He asked me to mention it to you as I did.

Good standing. Hmmm.... Sorry, but... Your account was actually only created after the last vandal account, Bandofgold, was shut down. You start off your career with a copyvio that is speedied (Mythology of Star Wars with George Lucas & Bill Moyers). Then you have a few normal edits. Then, just 6 days after account creation, you chance across RfA and make two apparently random unexplained votes ([5], [6]. Not typical behaviour of a genuine good-faith newbie. You insult an editor ([7]) and two days later cite "insults" as a reason for opposing another RfA ([8]). Then you have a freak AfD ([9]), some pretty idiosyncratic behaviour on a Featured article candidates discussion (Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Harry McNish) - how did you even find all those exotic areas in Wikipedia? - and some erroneous tinkering with interwiki links ([10]). Okay, I'll set you free, and wish you happy editing, but here's a piece of free advice: you might want to be a bit more careful about rushing into areas of the wiki for which you are not really quite qualified yet by your experience. And best regards to your sis and friends - you are hereby licensed to rip off their heads and serve them to us on a silver plate. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:21, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Like I said they are not great but they are not vandalism. I have worked on making them better. On those first 2 Rfas I Forget to leave a reason but I heve not done that since. I am not stupid by the way I know how to find stuff. By the way I am not a sock puppet of BandofGold. this is my first account. But anyway I have no more time for this good luck in the future.

Cylonhunter 14:19, 25 January 2007 (UTC) {{unblock-auto|1=72.159.134.195|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Cylonhunter1227". The reason given for Cylonhunter1227's block is: "troll account".|3=Future Perfect at Sunrise}} This IP is a shared IP

Autoblock lifted. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:28, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

per previous two. This is a shared IP.Cylonhunter 14:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Wait. School? Really? Schools normally don't have more than one single IP, do they? You shouldn't be stumbling onto so many IP autoblocks... – Chacor 14:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Apparantly someone that was previously blocked logged on recently. I am very sorry for an technical problems that this has caused.Cylonhunter 14:48, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

72.159.134.195 checks out to BellSouth. Do U.S. high schools use commercial ISPs? Hmm. I'm not entirely believing your story, here. – Chacor 14:50, 25 January 2007 (UTC) I am at my high school and I do believe that is our high schools IP. You are welcome to come visit and ask our principal if you do not believe me--Cylonhunter 14:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Warning

Re. your edit to bullying: most certainly, that is adding nonsense, even worse that you reverted a bot cleaning up. You're running very close to an indef block, so don't push it. – Chacor 14:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC) That bot has made mistakes in the past that led me to the belief that he made one here--Cylonhunter 14:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Lafayette College edits

Hi, Can you please read what is written (and cited) earlier in the article? What I deleted is duplicate information. Please reply here or on my talk page and let me know if you agree or disagree. - Mattingly23 14:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC) I corrected them--Cylonhunter 14:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

List of U.S. Colleges & Universities by Endowment

I was just wondering why you reverted my edit to the above page. You can review your edit here: Revert by Cylonhunter? I listed a valid source for the edit, the Kansas University Alumni Association website. You did not explain the revert in either the edit summary or the talk page. Please let me know. Thanks,--Getaway 16:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Polling Data

I have a dumb question. Why is wikipedia allowing polling data when polling data has proven to be extremely inaccurate at times? Isn't wikipedia an encyclopedia not a political news site--Cylonhunter 14:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Actually, that is a good question. I guess that is the type of encyclopedia that we get when everyone is allowed to edit. Under our system we don't get a straight-forward Britannica type of encyclopedia, but one where there is a lot of junk like quotes from Family Guy, the Simpsons, etc. in political articles, not articles about cartoons. We get "Trivia" sections full of favorite colors and shopping habits. I think that short-term polling data falls into category. Information that would not make it by Britannica standards, but is not so horrible that it MUST be excluded. Talk to you later,--Getaway 15:29, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Rush Limbaugh

The Nobel Prize section does not contain reliable sources, contrary to your edit summary claim. It has been removed again. There were only two sources. One was a press release from the nominating group. Press releases are not proper sources. The other said absolutely nothing about the nom. Please join us on the talk page to discuss the matter. Thanks! Vassyana 17:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Dear Cylonhunter: Right here is a link to a reliable source: http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7006343471 Folks that don't want the information in the article remove this reliable source and then argue that Limbaugh's nomination story does not have a reliable source.--BballJones 18:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

John McKissick

Hi. I've removed the prod tag from the above article, as I'm not certain it's prod material. I have instead listed it on AfD. You can see the debate here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John McKissick. Lankiveil 13:05, 15 March 2007 (UTC).

Your RFA

May I strongly suggest that you withdraw your RfA? You have been an editor here for just over two months, and have less that 200 edits total. Either of those is an absolute guarantee that your RfA will be unsuccessful. (You state that I am an active participator in admin. elections; if so, you should know what it takes for a successful RfA, as well as the fact that the process is not, technically, an "election".) -- John Broughton (♫♫) 14:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

In case you are not aware, Cylonhunter, User:DvDknight nominated you for adminship here, and filled out your answers for you (poorly). I expect the nomination will be deleted soon. Keep up your good work here, and I hope that you are someday an adminstrator! PouponOnToast 14:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Right, apologies for my error in thinking that you'd accepted the RfA. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 14:32, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Stratford Upon Avon High School

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Stratford Upon Avon High School) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Realkyhick 16:33, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Personal attacks will get you blocked

I quote from the attack message you left on my talk page:

let me tell you about nonsense you blithering idiot. You don't know a cats butt about Shakespeare and you probably do not even care, but please refrain from reverting my edits because I am watching you, you Alambamian.--Cylonhunter 21:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

This kind of behavior will not be tolerated. Continued conduct of this kind will result in you being blocked. This is your only warning. Realkyhick 21:30, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Gaffney High School

Thank you for posting a comment in my talk page =). I appreciate you are also interested on the quality of the article about Gaffney High School. You may be interested on collaborate in the discussion about how the requested cleanup should be performed. Rjgodoy 18:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. One or more of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CloudNine 16:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits to Blacksburg, South Carolina

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Cylonhunter! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule porn\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 16:28, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits to Baptist

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Baptist, you will be blocked from editing. HokieRNB 16:34, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to DVD (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 16:23, 28 April 2007 (UT)

Waz up?

Hey "stuff beans up your nose", ok? Good.--DvDknight 12:47, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

hey again

here is the link, mf

This page contains material which is kept because it is considered humorous. It is not intended, nor should it be used, for any remotely serious purpose.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Cylonhunter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

72.159.134.195. (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

autoblock message

• Blocking administrator: blocking admin (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cylonhunter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

There is no way cylonhunter is a sock puppet or a troll account of user: DvDknight. Cylonhunter is very much older than DvDknight and the account is clearly older on the contribs. Take a look for yourself. I am not a troll account of DvDknight.

Decline reason:

So the autoblock was entirely coincidental? I think not. — Sandstein 19:22, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cylonhunter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is a shared IP, I am not a sock puppet.

Decline reason:

Evidence suggests otherwise. – Steel 19:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

==Sock puppet==

This user is clearly not a sock puppet of DvDknight because this was created earlier than DvDknight. Look at the contribs for the evidence.--Black spiderman 13:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Blocked Black spiderman, a SPA account apparently made to try to get Cylonhunter unblocked, as another sockpuppet. For any admin reviewing this block, there are removed messages from this talk page. Cylonhunter and a whole bunch of other sockpuppet accounts popped up on a single day and all requested unblocking at once, and have all edited each others' user pages, talk pages, et cetera. It doesn't matter, of course, which account was the original one: the point is, there's a lot of abuse sockpuppetry going on here and all of it should be blocked. Mangojuice^talk 15:51, 11 May 2007 (UTC)