Welcome!

edit

Hello Cyber Islam BD!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (Cyber Islam BD) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started.

Happy editing! - wolf 22:09, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

November 2020

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of equipment of the Bangladesh Army, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:20, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Reliable sources

edit

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of equipment of the Bangladesh Army without citing a reliable source. Most websites are not reliable sources. Millisavunma.com, for example, is a self-published Wordpress blog, so not reliable. Defseca.com was recently discussed at the reliable sources noticeboard, where it was unanimously found not reliable.

There are only a few broad and reliable sources about the Bangladesh military: The Military Balance, various publications of Jane's, FlightGlobal's World Air Forces, and the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). Intermittent reports by other reputable organizations, such as the United Nations or the Bonn International Center for Conversion, may be reliable, but are usually narrowly focused. Bangladesh government documents are also reliable, but are generally narrow and are primary sources, so care must be taken with their use. The websites of mainstream reputable news organizations, such as the BBC News, The Daily Star, and Prothom Alo are acceptable for changes within the last 2-3 years (ones that may be too recent to have made it into the broad sources above), as are manufacturer's websites. If their "news" isn't confirmed by the broad reliable sources above within a few years, however, we shouldn't continue to rely upon it. Few journalists are military experts, and manufacturers have incentives to exaggerate and distort facts. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:19, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply