March 2009 edit

  This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Enigmamsg 04:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cutlerowns19 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Vandalism is wrong and if unblocked i will become a fighter against vandalism. Please give me a second chance.

Decline reason:

Removing this as a duplicate; your request is still up for review with the template below, but looking at your contributions, I don't see why we should consider unblocking you. Hersfold (t/a/c) 16:42, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have drawn the attention of the blocking admin to your request. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 19:12, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

If it takes only secounds to get rewported for vandalsim but for un blcoking it takes days.............................. whyCutlerowns19 (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


{{Unblock on hold|1=blocking administrator|2=.Like i said earlier if i am unblocked i will take part in the adoption program. How do you know what i will do if you dont give me the chance. This Block has made me upset and i wont cause trouble again. Please review the request. I dont know what else to say IT WONT HAPPEN AGAIN.}}

MY FUTURE edit

WHAT A SLOW PROCESS Like i said earlier if i am unblocked i will take part in the adoption program. How do you know what i will do if you dont give me the chance. This Block has made me upset and i wont cause trouble again. Please review the request. I dont know what else to say IT WONT HAPPEN AGAIN. Cutlerowns19 (talk) 03:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Blocking admin here edit

Why should we believe you? While you're answering that, I'll solicit some input from your favorite target. Toddst1 (talk)

{{Unblock on hold|1=blocking administrator|2=I will participate in the adoption program so i can learn more about Wikipedia and contribute positive contributions.|3=slakrtalk / 02:44, 24 March 2009 (UTC)}}Reply

I dont know why this is taking so long i just want to make positive contributions to wikipedia

Waiting for PMDrive to comment. We've got plenty of time. Toddst1 (talk) 23:50, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good and thanks for cleaning up the page. Im new to the formatting. Hopefully someone will adopt me.Cutlerowns19 (talk) 04:39, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

While we're waiting, could you list the other accounts you've used on Wikipedia? Clearly the first edits with this account were not your first ones ever; you show far too much familiarity with Wikipedia for that. Mangojuicetalk 17:05, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

The other account i had was skier1924 and that's itCutlerowns19 (talk) 19:44, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment – switched to on-hold. --slakrtalk / 02:44, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


How Long Cant we speed up the process

Everyone at Wikipedia is a volunteer. Sometimes it takes a while for someone to get online due to responsibilities elsewhere. While you're waiting, you may want to take some time reviewing our policies or you may want to consider editing at the Simple English Wikipedia. It's a little easier to get started on, and if your edits there seem to be constructive it could help your unblocking case here. Hersfold (t/a/c) 05:30, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply