Curriet

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article Bnbwebsites.com has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DJ Clayworth (talk) 17:49, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not use Wikipedia to promote your one-month-old company. Your edits to Netoria are not appropriate for an encyclopedia and have been reverted. DJ Clayworth (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

If you continue to use Wikipedia for promotional purposes, as you did at Netoria you may be blocked from editing. Please read Wikipedia:Notability to understand why your company is not eligible for an article on Wikipedia. If you do not understand the reasons for this you can ask questions by editing this page. DJ Clayworth (talk) 18:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Netoria. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. If you do not understand this warning please ask at my talk page DJ Clayworth (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Convoyant

A tag has been placed on Convoyant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Davnor (talk) 17:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Reservation Nexus

A tag has been placed on Reservation Nexus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Davnor (talk) 18:06, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Reverted edits to Netoria

Your recent edit to the page Netoria appears to have switched the central topic of the article, by replacing the original content (about a former directory services software company) with unrelated content (about a website design company). This is inappropriate, as it may lead to confusion for readers seeking information on the article's original topic. As a result, the changes have been reverted. If the new subject (the website design company) meets Wikipedia's notability criteria, please consider creating a new article with a distinct title, such as Netoria (website design), and adding a disambiguation link at the top of the existing Netoria article. Thank you! Davnor (talk) 18:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Removal of Speedy Deletion Tag

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Reservation Nexus. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Davnor (talk) 20:13, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Destination Nexus. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Mikeo (talk) 20:28, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Destination Nexus. Jusdafax 20:30, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Curriet for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 2 weeks, for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 20:58, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Bleckley Inn, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Bleckley Inn" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 16:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Bleckley Inn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bleckley Inn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bleckley Inn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Darylgolden^(talk) 12:42, 30 December 2014 (UTC)