Crvst
You should have contacted me before reverting. If you would look at the book (it's online) you would see that it was reviewed by all the top researchers in the field at the time. Please contact me with you exact objections instead of rv good material w/o checking up. I am unrving until I get a good objection.--Wolf2191 04:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Did you read the paragraph before rving? In the parentesis at the end is the name of the book (it's in hebrew) Igrot Shir and where it can be found (google books). We make an effort to write the posts why can't you read it first. At least add a citation needed instead of a thoughtless rv. No offense intended (I'm going to unRV)Wolf2191 04:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
I have, It fits with the guidelines (although I may have to bring a citation from the original as I translated it). Why is it nonesense? You're attitude in this is most provocative, unless you can be provide a clear reasoning I shall go to admin.Wolf2191 05:30, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's nonsense because you don't provide a concrete source. Crvst 05:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
I did (Igrot Shir) the letters of one of the foremost Jewish 19th century sages.Do explain why your knowledge of aramaic and greek exceeds his. I don't believe I am obligated to provide exact page (though I can try).Wolf2191 05:36, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- Igrot Shir what? Is what you claim in a published work of Igrot Shir, or a person quoting him/her? Add the name of that work, then. Crvst 05:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
The name of the work is Igrot Shir- an acronym for shlomo Judah Leib. Get it. It's in a published work do a search on google books. It's in hebrew. I will add in the english translation of the name if you rv.Wolf2191 05:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Igrot means letter in hebrew. Wolf2191 05:44, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
I've been trying to tell you that Igrot Shir is a book published posthumously of the letters of this scholar. It was reviewed by peers (as can be seen in it's introduction) and there is no english edition available. If you allow me to rv. I will try to be more specific.Wolf2191 05:50, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- If you add something that's sourced there's no reason for it to be reverted (everything that's not sourced can be removed).Crvst 05:54, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Do we speak the same lanquage. Anyway I'm going to rerv and translate the name of book,etc.)Wolf2191 05:57, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)