Hello, I'm Ravave. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Salvador Puig Antich that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, --Ravave (talk) 18:01, 17 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Normally, we put the real nationality of the person, please, stop it to make arbitrary editions or you will go to Administrator intervention against vandalism. Thank you. If you speak Spanish or Catalonian we can speack each other in our language. --Ravave (talk) 10:27, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Salvador Puig Antich, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. . --Ravave (talk) 07:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

I don't think that "vandalize" was the right word to use, as you are no doubt editing in good faith. However, you currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Salvador Puig Antich. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 07:55, 7 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Te hablaré en español por si acaso no entiendes el inglés (cosa que dudo, aunque mantendré la buena fe). Tus contribuciones son siempre las mismas: cambiar la nacionalidad de tal individuo (español a catalán). Al igual que a ti, el user JamesBWatson se ha puesto en contacto conmigo y me ha dejado el mismo mensaje diciendo que en caso de caer en guerras de ediciones seriamos bloqueados. Este user quiere que lleguemos a un consenso, sin embargo la Wikipedia es apolítica. Confío en que tus ediciones no sean por puro interés político, en todo caso tendría que reportarte por Cuenta con propósito particular. No es mi intención coartarte si es lo que piensas, así que te agradecería que te pusieras en contacto conmigo. --Ravave (talk) 15:05, 7 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Finally you answer. Even the sources says him is Catalonian, his currently nationality is Spanish by dismay to you. Altough the MIL was a Catalonian group that doesn't mean Catalonia is a country. Besides: Catalonia has a own goverment, Valencia too (its called Les Corts valèncianes"), all Spanish regions has its own goverment (La Mancha, C-León-Galicia. etc...). Look, i be waiting to reach an agree, but i'm going to ask another user for come a term. --Ravave (talk) 09:21, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
You don't want sources? take these: [1]See second page, 1st paragraphIn Spanish and Catalonian says he was Catalonian, but in english says he was from Spain, isn't a contradictionAlmost the final, in Famous People Named Salvador[2][3]. --Ravave (talk) 10:07, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
How we are in disagree, i'd be go to the Administrators, if you want have your comments, go ahead. --Ravave (talk) 15:16, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hi CristofolR, I leave a message in the talkpage of Salvador Puig Antich. For avoid more arguments i'd be thinking in remove "Catalonian/Spanish" and leave it in anarchist and no more. At least by the moment. Please go to the talkpage and answer there. --Ravave (talk) 08:21, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply