January 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Robin Schulz, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:01, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to AK1200. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:06, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 01:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wait for U have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wait for U was changed by Correctorofmistakes1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.909137 on 2024-06-23T13:44:16+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at We Don't Trust You. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: We Don't Trust You was changed by Correctorofmistakes1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95907 on 2024-06-23T13:47:48+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 19:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

ok what the hell, it’s not that serious. i literally just stylized albums in all caps, in all caps. Correctorofmistakes1 (talk) 19:55, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
btw, this is you: 🤓 Correctorofmistakes1 (talk) 19:59, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The Lo-Fis

edit
 

The article The Lo-Fis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTABLE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 09:55, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply