Correctionedits422

Welcome!

Hi Correctionedits422! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Jorm (talk) 06:02, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

DS Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Jorm (talk) 06:02, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

March 21

Why do you not wish to sign our posts?Slatersteven (talk) 18:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Did not realize how to sign, future posts will be formatted correctly. Correctionedits422 (talk) 18:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

I sugest you read wp:rs and wp:v.Slatersteven (talk) 19:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

I suggest you actually follow wp:rs and wp:v. Correctionedits422 (talk) 19:12, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Warning

Your recent editing history at Focus on the Family shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

--Jorm (talk) 19:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

This was addressed on the page, I was simply reverting back an edit made by another user to reply to objections brought up by Jorm. Will start a talk page thread in the future though Correctionedits422 (talk) 19:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)