Copyright problems edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Trail of feathers, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://tahirshah-trailoffeathers.blogspot.com/. As a copyright violation, Trail of feathers appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Trail of feathers has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Trail of feathers and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Trail of feathers with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Trail of feathers.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bonadea (talk) 12:13, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you yourself are the author of the material, please also note Wikipedia:Coi#What_is_a_conflict_of_interest.3F. While it is permissible to work on articles relating to oneself, or one's family and associates, this has to be done in a very circumspect manner, and take into account the relevant WP policies and guidelines – such as

Please don't let this discourage you from contributing, but do take the time to familiarise yourself with the indicated guidelines. Best, Jayen466 13:10, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:DSC09752.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:DSC09752.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

WP articles for Trail of feathers and other works by Tahir Shah edit

Re the short-lived attempt to create a WP article on Trail of Feathers by Tahir Shah, I believe – given the cover story in Geographical that I came across in the Tahir Shah article, and given the existing news coverage of this and other works by TS – that a case could well be made for having articles on these works in Wikipedia. However, the first article version submitted must demonstrate notability, by means of citations of press or radio coverage of the work(s) – and of course we can't simply lift out a section from Tahir Shah's blog to create the article :-).

Some editors find it helpful to draft new articles in a "sandbox" page in their user space (such as User:Coldwinterday/sandbox) and only put it in the Wikipedia article space when it is ready. (User's sandboxes are not subject to the speedy deletion policy, and every user is entitled to create such sandbox pages to facilitate their work here.)

So, if you feel like trying again, do, but bearing the above in mind. I could well imagine the article standing successfully another time round, provided the writing summarises existing coverage in high-quality sources. Some of the other works by TS, like The Caliph's House, have received even more coverage, enhancing the chances of a successful article that satisfies both WP:NOTE and WP:V. And I am happy to have a look at a draft and give you feedback. Cheers, Jayen466 20:53, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:A82.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.independentfilm.com/festivals/flip-a-coin-the-movie-at-.shtml. As a copyright violation, Image:A82.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:A82.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:A82.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:A82.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:A82.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 19:18, 24 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

FYI edit

As your editing behaviour could reasonably be interpreted to primarily serve outside interests, rather than the interests of Wikipedia, I have brought the matter to the attention of the Conflict of Interest noticeboard for further examination by the Wikipedia community. You are welcome to respond there. The thread is here. Best, Jayen466 20:01, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Peacock terms edit

Regarding the use of peacock terms in some edits (for example unsourced words like "legendary" when referring to Idries Shah), you might like to check out WP:PEACOCK. With good wishes, EricT (talk) 17:02, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:In Arabian Nights shah.jpg} edit

Thank you for uploading Image:In Arabian Nights shah.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:17, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The caliph's house.jpg} edit

Thank you for uploading Image:The caliph's house.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 09:23, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Trail of feathers.jpg} edit

Thank you for uploading Image:Trail of feathers.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:27, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:House of the tiger king.jpg} edit

Thank you for uploading Image:House of the tiger king.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading.STBotI (talk) 09:39, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your uploads edit

Good day. I see that you have uploaded a number of images to Wikipedia. First off, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, there are some guidelines that we need to follow with copyrighted images. Specifically, you need to add a source for the image (a link to a website will do), a copyright tag (there are some listed at WP:ICT), and a rationale explaining why we can use a copyrighted image (explained at WP:NFURG). I see that your images fail to include one of these. Please stop uploading images and address the concerns listed above. If you need assistance, you can ask at the help desk. If you do not fix these images, and you continue to make bad uploads, you will be blocked and your images will be deleted. Thanks for your contributions! STBotI (talk) 09:39, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Middle_east_bedside_book.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Middle_east_bedside_book.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 06:02, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Institute for Cultural Research logo.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Institute for Cultural Research logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 16 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —Wknight94 (talk) 16:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Cultural research.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Cultural research.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply